Field Office Compliance - Desktop Activity

Desk Action ID - 202982

Madrid Water Department - 310337294

1575 334TH ST Madrid, IA 50156

Boone County

FO 5

Site Name:

Address:

City:

County:

State:

Zip:

Directions:

Section:

Tier:

Range:

Long:

Lat:

Desktop Action ID:

Program Type:

Program ID:

Action Type:

Date:

Staff:

Compliance Determination:

Status:

Activity Report

Attached Files/Reports

File Name	File Type	File Date	Note

Comments

Date	Comment	Commenter
6/19/2025	Re: May MOR Gastineau, Janet <janet.gastineau@dnr.iowa.gov> Wed, Jun 18, 3:05?PM (1 day ago) to MCH Well, most operators call over 1 NTU because they don't know about the 1.49 NTU, and they're usually shaken up enough when it happens to want to consult. Anyway, I'll accept the MOR as revised (no treatment technique violation) but you're got to get the turbidity protocol up-to-date and give me a timeline for your SCADA integrator coming in to review data capture and recovery. Going forward, all MORs will have to have the new way of counting the number of turbidity readings taken daily. On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 1:56?PM MCH W plant <waterplant@madridiowa.org> wrote: We’ve adjusted the number of readings taken on the CFE column of the basic information page to be representative of the actual readings taken while the plant is on. And on the summary page we’ve made the corresponding adjustments to Section 4a-c. The reason we didn’t call about the >1NTU which according to the CFE 1 NTU letter which you had sent, we aren’t required to call unless the NTU is greater than 1.49 NTU? Are we interpreting both the letter you sent and the notes on our operational permit incorrectly?	JANET GASTINEAU
6/17/2025	percent of readings less than or equal to 0.3 NTU was 59.15 percent for May TTV issued I called Mike to inform him and to revise the MOR because he used 652 turbidity readings to calculate his CFE turbidity summary.	JANET GASTINEAU

Comment:

Compliance Tracking

Action Type	Date	Completed Date	Comment	Delete

"

"