Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

South Bear Creek IA 01-UIA-252

confluence with N. Bear Cr. (S25 T100N R7W) to spring source (Mestad Spring) in S29 T100N R7W Winneshiek Co.

Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/18/2016 10:02:21 AM
Updated
2/6/2017 2:57:53 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Partially Supported
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5p - Impairment occurs on a waterbody with a presumptive A1 or B(WW1) use.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2016
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Watershed project monitoring
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class A2
Recreation - Secondary contact
Fully Supported
Class BCW1
Aquatic Life - Cold Water Type 1
Not Assessed
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2004 Class BCW1 Fish Kill: Due To Unknown Toxicity Fish kill investigation: Iowa DNR New data: recovery of fish community from pollutant-caused fish kill
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supporting” (IR 5p) due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceed water quality criteria.  This is a new impairment for this assessment segment.  The presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” (IR 2a).  The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported” (IR 2a) based on an updated summary of trout reproduction by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.   Fish consumption (Class HH) uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment (IR 3a).  The sources of data for this assessment are (1) the results of monitoring for indicator bacteria conducted at Site 23 of the Upper Iowa River Watershed (UIRW) project (STORET No.  NEIARCD 191910014) from April 2012 through October 2014, (2) results of the fish kill investigation near Highlandville in 1999 and (3) the January 2016 summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau. 

Assessment Explanation

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed as “partially supporting”.  The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 21 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2012 through 2014 at UIRW Site 23 were as follows:  the 2012 geometric mean was 50 orgs/100 ml, the 2013 geometric mean was 135 orgs/100 ml, and the 2014 geometric mean was 125 orgs/100 ml.  Only the 2013 geometric mean exceeded the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml and then only very slightly (by 9 orgs/100 ml).  Six of the 21 samples (29%) exceeded the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric means exceeds the respective water quality criterion, the contact recreation uses should be assessed as “impaired” (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b).  All three geometric means met and were far below the Class A2 geometric mean criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml.  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if all recreation season geometric means meet the respective water quality criterion, the contact recreation uses are "fully supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b).  Despite the new impairment of the Class A1 uses, this stream segment continues to show some of the lowest stream bacteria levels in the state of Iowa.

Based on the 2012-2014 water quality results and 2016 updated IDNR Fisheries trout reproduction data, the Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supporting”.  Results of water quality monitoring from 2012 to 2014 at Upper Iowa River Watershed Site 23 do not indicate impairment of the Class B(CW1) uses.  Analysis of 14 samples for ammonia, temperature, and pH showed that none of the samples collected violated the respective Class B(CW1) criteria.

The updated summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau in January 2016 also suggests the Class B(CW1) uses are "fully supported".  According to the updated summary, Bear Creek (aka South Bear Creek) is in the group of Iowa coldwater streams that supports natural reproduction of trout.  Based on results of surveys by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, this stream is placed in the category of Iowa trout streams that exhibit recent, but inconsistent reproductive success and that are generally not capable of maintaining a viable population of Brown Trout at this time (a Category II stream).

The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses were historically assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported.”  These uses were assessed as "partially supported" for the 2000 through 2004 assessment cycles due to occurrence of a fish kill on August 5, 1999 northwest of Highlandville in Winneshiek County.  As stated in the assessment developed for the 2000 report, the kill followed a 2-3 inch rainfall event; no other water quality problems were observed.  An estimated 3,200 fish were killed.  No responsible party for the kill was identified.  According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, the occurrence of a single pollutant-caused fish kill, or a fish kill of unknown origin, on a waterbody or waterbody reach indicates a severe stress to the aquatic community and suggests that the aquatic life uses should be assessed as “impaired.”  If a cause of the kill is identified, and the cause is either known, or suspected, to be a “pollutant”, the assessment type is considered “monitored” and the affected waterbody is a candidate for Section 303(d) listing.  Fish kills attributed to a pollutant, but where a source of the pollutant was not identified and/or where enforcement actions were not taken against the responsible party, will be placed into Integrated Report subcategory 5b.  The intent of placing these waterbodies into Category 5 is not to necessarily require a TMDL but to keep the impairment highlighted due to the potential for similar future kills from the unaddressed causes and/or sources.  For its draft 2006 assessment, IDNR considered this stream segment to be “not assessed” (IR Category 3a) and proposed this impairment for removal from Iowa’s 2006 Section 303(d) list.  According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology at that time, if the most recent pollution-caused fish kill occurred on this stream segment more than six years ago (i.e., before the 2000-2005 period), any toxic impacts associated with the kill are assumed to have dissipated, and the affected water would be considered “not assessed.”  

IDNR believes that the combination of the water quality and trout reproduction data indicate that there has been a full recovery of the aquatic life in this stream following the fish kill.  IDNR has de-listed the 5b impairment due to the 1999 fishkill and the aquatic life uses of this segment now reside in IR 2a. 

 

Fish consumption uses are not assessed due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream reach.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
4/3/2012
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
10/7/2014
Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/5/1999
Fish Kill
1/1/2016
Biological Monitoring
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
140
Incidence of spills and/or fish kills
220
Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
330
Fish surveys
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring