Point Hollow Creek (aka White Pine Cr.) IA 01-TRK-165
mouth (S31 T91N R2W Clayton Co.) to spring source in S8 T90N R2W Dubuque Co.
- Assessment Cycle
- 2022
- Release Status
- Final
- Data Collection Period
- Overall IR Category
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 12/21/2021 5:31:28 AM
- Updated
- 1/25/2022 8:54:29 AM
Both the presumptive Class A1 and the Class A2 uses remain assessed as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BCW1 use was assessed as "not supported" based on a fish kill investigation, biological sampling data and "fully supported" based on continuous dissolved oxygen monitoring data. All other designated uses were "not assessed."
Data Sources:
Data Source |
Data Source ID |
Data Type |
Data Age |
Site ID |
Site Name |
Site Description |
Iowa DNR |
6 |
WQ |
CY 2010, 2012 |
11310005 |
White Point Hollow near Luxemburg |
Site WPH1 |
Iowa DNR |
6 |
WQ |
CY 2010, 2012 |
11310006 |
White Point Hollow near Luxemburg |
|
Iowa DNR |
6 |
BIO |
See Below |
407 |
White Point Hollow Creek |
Luxemburg |
Iowa DNR |
6 |
BIO |
See Below |
370 |
White Point Hollow Creek |
Luxemburg – REMAP #58 |
Presumptive Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: 2010
Site ID |
Data Source ID |
# Samples / # Years |
2010 Geomean |
Annual Geomean Violation |
# Violations |
% Violations |
Significantly >10% Violations |
Assessment Type |
Support Level |
11310005 |
6 |
16 / 1 |
917 |
Yes |
12 |
75% |
Yes |
Evaluated |
Not |
11310006 |
6 |
9 / 1 |
359 |
Yes |
6 |
67% |
Yes |
Evaluated |
Not |
Class A2 - Indicator Bacteria:
Site ID |
Data Source ID |
# Samples / # Years |
2010 Geomean |
Annual Geometric Mean Violation |
# Violations |
% Violations |
Significantly >10% Violations |
Assessment Type |
Support Level |
11310005 |
6 |
17 / 1 |
991 |
Yes |
6 |
35% |
Yes |
Evaluated |
Not |
11310006 |
6 |
10 / 1 |
461 |
No |
2 |
20% |
No |
Evaluated |
Full |
Class
BCW1 - Biological Sampling:
Benthic Macroinvertebrates:
Site ID |
Date |
Drainage Area (mi2) |
Ecoregion |
Major Drainage |
BM Sample Gear |
CBI score |
CBI Class |
CBI BIT |
CBI Pass/Fail |
370 |
8/23/19 |
3.9 |
52b |
MS |
Surber |
41 |
NA |
60 |
Pass |
407 |
7/22/15 |
6.1 |
52b |
MS |
Surber |
51 |
NA |
60 |
Pass |
Overall:
Community |
Assessment Type |
Assessment Result |
Support Level |
IR Category |
Reason |
Benthic Macroinvertebrates |
Monitored |
Fail (0/2) |
Not |
Assessment was monitored because the assessment used multiple |
|
Overall |
Monitored |
Fail |
Not |
5bv |
samples collected in a recent five year period to complete the assessment. |
Class BCW1- Fishkill Assessment:
The Class BCW1 use assessment based on the 2017 fish kill placed this segment in Category 4d. The fish kill was caused by a “pollutant” or was suspected to be caused by a “pollutant”; therefore, the Class BCW1 use was considered impaired. However, because restitution for the fish killed was received, the Class BCW1 use was placed in Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required). DNR feels that (1) TMDLs should not be required for a fish kill caused by a one-time illegal or unauthorized release of a pollutant where enforcement action was taken and (2) enforcement action is more appropriate and effective for addressing a spill-related impairment than the TMDL process.
Details about the 2017 fish kill can be found here: https://programs.iowadnr.gov/fishkill/Events/948
Class BCW1 - Continuous DO Monitoring:
Site ID |
Data Source ID |
# Days Monitoring (2016/2017/2018/ 2019/2020) |
DO Criteria Type |
# 2016 violations / Violations needed for impairment |
# 2017 violations / Violations needed for impairment |
# 2018 violations / Violations needed for impairment |
# 2019 violations / Violations needed for impairment |
# 2020 violations / Violations needed for impairment |
Violates Annual Significantly >10% Rule? |
Assessment Type |
Support Level |
|
|
|
24 hr |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0/6 |
NA |
No |
|
|
370 |
6 |
0/0/0/31/0 |
16 hr |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0/6 |
NA |
No |
Evaluated |
Full |
Class HH – No Data