Point Hollow Creek (aka White Pine Cr.) IA 01-TRK-165
mouth (S31 T91N R2W Clayton Co.) to spring source in S8 T90N R2W Dubuque Co.
- Assessment Cycle
- 2022
- Release Status
- Final
- Data Collection Period
- Overall IR Category
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 12/21/2021 5:31:28 AM
- Updated
- 1/25/2022 8:54:29 AM
Both the presumptive Class A1 and the Class A2 uses remain assessed as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BCW1 use was assessed as "not supported" based on a fish kill investigation, biological sampling data and "fully supported" based on continuous dissolved oxygen monitoring data. All other designated uses were "not assessed."
Data Sources: Data Source Data Source ID Data Type Data Age Site ID Site Name Site Description Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2010, 2012 11310005 White Point Hollow
near Luxemburg Site WPH1 Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2010, 2012 11310006 White Point Hollow
near Luxemburg Iowa DNR 6 BIO See Below 407 White Point Hollow
Creek Luxemburg Iowa DNR 6 BIO See Below 370 White Point Hollow
Creek Luxemburg – REMAP #58 Site ID Data Source ID # Samples / # Years 2010 Geomean Annual Geomean
Violation # Violations % Violations Significantly >10%
Violations Assessment Type Support Level 11310005 6 16 / 1 917 Yes 12 75% Yes Evaluated Not 11310006 6 9 / 1 359 Yes 6 67% Yes Evaluated Not Site ID Data Source ID # Samples / # Years 2010 Geomean Annual Geometric Mean
Violation # Violations % Violations Significantly >10%
Violations Assessment Type Support Level 11310005 6 17 / 1 991 Yes 6 35% Yes Evaluated Not 11310006 6 10 / 1 461 No 2 20% No Evaluated Full Site ID Date Drainage Area (mi2) Ecoregion Major Drainage BM Sample Gear CBI score CBI Class CBI BIT CBI Pass/Fail 370 8/23/19 3.9 52b MS Surber 41 NA 60 Pass 407 7/22/15 6.1 52b MS Surber 51 NA 60 Pass Community Assessment Type Assessment Result Support Level IR Category Reason Benthic
Macroinvertebrates Monitored Fail (0/2) Not Assessment was monitored
because the assessment used multiple Overall Monitored Fail Not 5bv samples collected in a
recent five year period to complete the assessment. The Class BCW1 use assessment based on the
2017 fish kill placed this segment in Category 4d. The fish kill was caused by
a “pollutant” or was suspected to be caused by a “pollutant”; therefore, the Class BCW1 use was considered impaired. However, because
restitution for the fish killed was received, the Class BCW1 use
was placed in Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required). DNR feels that (1)
TMDLs should not be required for a fish kill caused by a one-time illegal or unauthorized
release of a pollutant where enforcement action was taken and (2) enforcement
action is more appropriate and effective for addressing a spill-related
impairment than the TMDL process. Details about the 2017 fish kill can be found
here: https://programs.iowadnr.gov/fishkill/Events/948 Class BCW1 - Continuous DO Monitoring:
Site ID Data Source ID # Days Monitoring (2016/2017/2018/ 2019/2020) DO Criteria Type # 2016 violations /
Violations needed for impairment # 2017 violations /
Violations needed for impairment # 2018 violations
/ Violations needed for impairment # 2019 violations /
Violations needed for impairment # 2020 violations /
Violations needed for impairment Violates Annual Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level
24 hr NA NA NA 0/6 NA No
370 6 0/0/0/31/0 16 hr NA NA NA 0/6 NA No Evaluated Full
Class HH – No Data
Presumptive Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: 2010
Class A2 - Indicator Bacteria:
Class
BCW1 - Biological Sampling:
Benthic Macroinvertebrates:
Overall:
Class BCW1- Fishkill Assessment: