Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Point Hollow Creek (aka White Pine Cr.) IA 01-TRK-165

mouth (S31 T91N R2W Clayton Co.) to spring source in S8 T90N R2W Dubuque Co.

Assessment Cycle
2020
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
6/15/2020 8:46:42 AM
Updated
10/15/2020 7:28:39 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2020 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation
Primary contact
Partially Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5p - Impairment occurs on a waterbody with a presumptive A1 or B(WW1) use.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Watershed project monitoring
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class A2
Recreation
Secondary contact
Partially Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5p - Impairment occurs on a waterbody with a presumptive A1 or B(WW1) use.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2016
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Watershed project monitoring
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BCW1
Aquatic Life
Cold Water Type 1
Partially Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5b-v - Biological - verified
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4d - Pollutant-caused fish kill. No TMDL needed and administrative action taken against responsible party.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
New
Source
Agriculture: Feedlots
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2020
Impairment Rationale
Pollutant-caused fish kill
Data Source
Fish kill investigation: Iowa DNR
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2016
Impairment Rationale
Significantly > 10% of samples fail to meet criterion
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-continuous
Class HH
Human Health
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

Both the presumptive Class A1 and the presumptive Class A2 uses remain assessed as “partially supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BCW1 use was assessed as "partially supported" based on a fish kill investigation, biological sampling data and on continuous monitoring data. All other designated uses were "not assessed".

Assessment Explanation

Sources of Data:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2010,2012

11310005

White Point Hollow near Luxemburg

Site WPH1

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2010

11310006

White Point Hollow near Luxemburg

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

407

White Point Hollow Creek

Luxemburg

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

909

White Point Hollow Creek

Luxemburg (WPH1)


Presumptive Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

2010 Geomean

Annual Geomean Violation

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

11310005

6

16 / 1

917

Yes

12

75%

Yes

Evaluated

Partial

11310006

6

9 / 1

359

Yes

6

67%

Yes

Evaluated

Partial


Presumptive Class A2 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

2010 Geomean

Annual Geometric Mean Violation

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

11310005

6

17 / 1

991

Yes

6

35%

Yes

Evaluated

Partial

11310006

6

10 / 1

461

No

2

20%

No

Evaluated

Full


Class A - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

11310005

6

14 / 2

8.9

8.43

8.4

No

0

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

6

10 / 1

8.6

8.2

8.2

No

0

No

Evaluated

Full


Class BCW1 - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

11310005

6

Ammonia

11 / 2

0.48

0.09

0.05

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310005

6

Chloride

17 / 2

13

10.5

11

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310005

6

Dissolved Oxygen

14 / 2

14.3

11.5

11.6

NA / 2

NA / 8%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310005

6

pH

14 / 2

8.9

8.43

8.4

0 / NA

0% / NA

No

Evaluated

Full

11310005

6

Sulfate

17 / 2

21

15.3

16

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310005

19

Temperature

14 / 2

19.8

13.5

14.4

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

6

Ammonia

10 / 1

0.63

0.11

0.05

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

6

Chloride

10 / 1

17

14.2

15

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

6

Dissolved Oxygen

10 / 1

14

10.5

10

NA / 2

NA / 8%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

6

pH

10 / 1

8.6

8.2

8.2

0 / NA

0% / NA

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

6

Sulfate

10 / 1

23

19.5

21

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

11310006

19

Temperature

10 / 1

18

11.8

12.1

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full


Class BCW1 - Biological Sampling:

Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

BioNet Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage/Thermal

BM Sample Gear

CBI score

CBI Class

CBI BIT

CBI Pass/ Fail

407

7/22/15

4

52b

MS/CW

Surb

51

NA

60

Fail

909

9/5/12

4

52b

MS/CW

Hess

31

NA

60

Fail

407

9/4/12

6

52b

MS/CW

Surb

55

NA

60

Fail

407

7/23/12

4

52b

MS/CW

Hess

52

NA

60

Fail

Overall Assessment:

Community

Assessment Type

Assessment Result

Support Level

Earned IR Category

Actual IR Category

Reason

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Evaluated

Fail (0/4)

Partial

3bc

5bv

Assessment is evaluated because the samples were not collected in the last five years.


Class BCW1- Fishkill Assessment:

The Class BCW1 use assessment based on the 2017 fish kill placed this segment in Category 4d. The fish kill was caused by a “pollutant” or was suspected to be caused by a “pollutant”; therefore, the presumptive Class BCW1 use was considered impaired. However, because restitution for the fish killed was received, the presumptive Class BCW1 use was placed in Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required). DNR feels that (1) TMDLs should not be required for a fish kill caused by a one-time illegal or unauthorized release of a pollutant where enforcement action was taken and (2) enforcement action is more appropriate and effective for addressing a spill-related impairment than the TMDL process.

Details about the 2017 fish kill can be found here:https://programs.iowadnr.gov/fishkill/Events/948

Class BCW1 - Continuous Monitoring:

Continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) monitoring data collected in 2012 for the DNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project at station 11310006 were examined for DO criteria violations. The lowest DO concentration recorded in 51 days of continuous monitoring was 6.3 mg/L. The daily DO minimum concentration failed to meet the 24-hour DO criterion (5 mg/L) in 0 of 51 days. The percentage exceeding (0%) was less than (passing) the 10% impairment threshold used to assess conventional water quality parameters. The associated statistical analysis confidence level was high (>90%). The 16-hour DO criterion (7 mg/L) was exceeded in 4 of 51 days. The percentage exceeding (7.8%) was less than (passing) the 10% threshold; however, the statistical analysis confidence level was not high (<90%). Based on these data, the BCW1 aquatic life use is assessed as not impaired for DO. The assessment type is “evaluated” because it is based on data collected from a single year within the current data assessment period. In order to meet the requirements for a “monitored” assessment, the DNR’s continuous monitoring assessment methodology requires monitoring data from two or more years within the assessment period.

Continuous stream temperature monitoring data collected in 2012 for the DNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project at stations 11310006 and 11310005 were examined for temperature criteria violations. At station 11310006, the maximum stream temperature recorded during the sensor deployment period was 18.6 degrees (C). The BCW1 temperature criterion of 20 (C) was exceeded in 0 of 51 days. The percentage exceeding (0%) was less than (passing) the 10% impairment threshold with high statistical confidence (>90%). At station 11310005, the maximum daily temperature was 27.3 degrees (C). The BCW1 temperature criterion of 20 (C) was exceeded in 78 of 111 days between 6/21/2012 and 10/9/2012. The percentage exceeding (70%) was greater than (failing) the 10% impairment threshold with high statistical confidence (>90%). Based on these data, the BCW1 use is assessed as impaired for water temperature. The assessment type is “evaluated” because it is based on data collected from a single year within the current data assessment period. In order to meet the requirements for a “monitored” assessment, the DNR’s continuous monitoring assessment methodology requires monitoring data from two or more years within the assessment period.

The substantially different continuous monitoring results obtained from stations 11310006 and 11310005 suggest that the stream temperature regime is not consistent throughout the entire stream segment. Additional continuous monitoring and an assessment of coldwater inputs (e.g., groundwater seeps and springs) in the vicinity of the sampling sites might be needed to determine whether the BCW1 use is the appropriate designated use for the entire segment or just certain areas within the segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/22/2015
Biological Monitoring
3/10/2010
Non-fixed Monitoring Start Date
7/26/2010
Non-fixed Monitoring End Date
7/23/2012
Biological Monitoring
9/4/2012
Biological Monitoring
9/5/2012
Biological Monitoring
6/21/2012
Non-fixed Monitoring Start Date
10/9/2012
Non-fixed Monitoring End Date
7/5/2017
Fish Kill
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
140
Incidence of spills and/or fish kills
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
220
Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring