Assessment Summary
Both the presumptive Class A1 and the presumptive Class A2 uses remain assessed as “partially supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BCW1 use was assessed as "partially supported" based on a fish kill investigation, biological sampling data and on continuous monitoring data. All other designated uses were "not assessed".
Assessment Explanation
Sources of Data:
Data
Source
|
Data
Source ID
|
Data
Type
|
Data
Age
|
Site
ID
|
Site
Name
|
Site
Description
|
Iowa
DNR
|
6
|
WQ
|
CY
2010,2012
|
11310005
|
White
Point Hollow near Luxemburg
|
Site
WPH1
|
Iowa
DNR
|
6
|
WQ
|
CY
2010
|
11310006
|
White
Point Hollow near Luxemburg
|
|
Iowa
DNR
|
6
|
BIO
|
See
Below
|
407
|
White
Point Hollow Creek
|
Luxemburg
|
Iowa
DNR
|
6
|
BIO
|
See
Below
|
909
|
White
Point Hollow Creek
|
Luxemburg
(WPH1)
|
Presumptive
Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:
Site ID
|
Data Source ID
|
# Samples / # Years
|
2010 Geomean
|
Annual Geomean Violation
|
# Violations
|
% Violations
|
Significantly >10% Violations
|
Assessment Type
|
Support Level
|
11310005
|
6
|
16 / 1
|
917
|
Yes
|
12
|
75%
|
Yes
|
Evaluated
|
Partial
|
11310006
|
6
|
9 / 1
|
359
|
Yes
|
6
|
67%
|
Yes
|
Evaluated
|
Partial
|
Presumptive Class A2 -
Indicator Bacteria:
Site
ID
|
Data
Source ID
|
#
Samples / # Years
|
2010
Geomean
|
Annual
Geometric Mean Violation
|
#
Violations
|
%
Violations
|
Significantly
>10% Violations
|
Assessment
Type
|
Support
Level
|
11310005
|
6
|
17 / 1
|
991
|
Yes
|
6
|
35%
|
Yes
|
Evaluated
|
Partial
|
11310006
|
6
|
10 / 1
|
461
|
No
|
2
|
20%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
Class A - pH:
Site
ID
|
Data
Source ID
|
#
Samples / # Years
|
Maximum
Value
|
Mean
Value
|
Median
Value
|
#
Violations
|
%
Violations
|
Significantly
>10% Violations
|
Assessment
Type
|
Support
Level
|
11310005
|
6
|
14
/ 2
|
8.9
|
8.43
|
8.4
|
No
|
0
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
6
|
10 / 1
|
8.6
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
No
|
0
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
Class BCW1 - Conventional
Parameters:
Site
ID
|
Data
Source ID
|
Parameter
Name
|
#
Samples / # Years
|
Maximum
Value
|
Mean
Value
|
Median
Value
|
#
Acute / Chronic Violations
|
%
Acute/ Chronic Violations
|
Significantly
>10% Violations
|
Assessment
Type
|
Support
Level
|
11310005
|
6
|
Ammonia
|
11
/ 2
|
0.48
|
0.09
|
0.05
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310005
|
6
|
Chloride
|
17
/ 2
|
13
|
10.5
|
11
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310005
|
6
|
Dissolved
Oxygen
|
14
/ 2
|
14.3
|
11.5
|
11.6
|
NA
/ 2
|
NA
/ 8%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310005
|
6
|
pH
|
14
/ 2
|
8.9
|
8.43
|
8.4
|
0
/ NA
|
0%
/ NA
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310005
|
6
|
Sulfate
|
17
/ 2
|
21
|
15.3
|
16
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310005
|
19
|
Temperature
|
14
/ 2
|
19.8
|
13.5
|
14.4
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
6
|
Ammonia
|
10 / 1
|
0.63
|
0.11
|
0.05
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
6
|
Chloride
|
10 / 1
|
17
|
14.2
|
15
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
6
|
Dissolved
Oxygen
|
10 / 1
|
14
|
10.5
|
10
|
NA
/ 2
|
NA
/ 8%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
6
|
pH
|
10 / 1
|
8.6
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
0
/ NA
|
0%
/ NA
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
6
|
Sulfate
|
10 / 1
|
23
|
19.5
|
21
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
11310006
|
19
|
Temperature
|
10 / 1
|
18
|
11.8
|
12.1
|
0
/ 0
|
0%
/ 0%
|
No
|
Evaluated
|
Full
|
Class
BCW1 - Biological Sampling:
Benthic
Macroinvertebrates:
BioNet Site ID
|
Date
|
Drainage Area (mi2)
|
Ecoregion
|
Major Drainage/Thermal
|
BM Sample Gear
|
CBI score
|
CBI Class
|
CBI BIT
|
CBI Pass/ Fail
|
407
|
7/22/15
|
4
|
52b
|
MS/CW
|
Surb
|
51
|
NA
|
60
|
Fail
|
909
|
9/5/12
|
4
|
52b
|
MS/CW
|
Hess
|
31
|
NA
|
60
|
Fail
|
407
|
9/4/12
|
6
|
52b
|
MS/CW
|
Surb
|
55
|
NA
|
60
|
Fail
|
407
|
7/23/12
|
4
|
52b
|
MS/CW
|
Hess
|
52
|
NA
|
60
|
Fail
|
Overall
Assessment:
Community
|
Assessment Type
|
Assessment Result
|
Support Level
|
Earned IR Category
|
Actual IR Category
|
Reason
|
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
|
Evaluated
|
Fail (0/4)
|
Partial
|
3bc
|
5bv
|
Assessment
is evaluated because the samples were not collected in the last five years.
|
Class BCW1- Fishkill Assessment:
The Class BCW1 use assessment based on the 2017 fish kill placed this segment in Category 4d. The fish kill was caused by a “pollutant” or was suspected to be caused by a “pollutant”; therefore, the presumptive Class BCW1 use was considered impaired. However, because restitution for the fish killed was received, the presumptive Class BCW1 use was placed in Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required). DNR feels that (1) TMDLs should not be required for a fish kill caused by a one-time illegal or unauthorized release of a pollutant where enforcement action was taken and (2) enforcement action is more appropriate and effective for addressing a spill-related impairment than the TMDL process.
Details about the 2017 fish kill can be found here:https://programs.iowadnr.gov/fishkill/Events/948
Class BCW1 - Continuous Monitoring:
Continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) monitoring data collected in 2012 for the DNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project at station 11310006 were examined for DO criteria violations. The lowest DO concentration recorded in 51 days of continuous monitoring was 6.3 mg/L. The daily DO minimum concentration failed to meet the 24-hour DO criterion (5 mg/L) in 0 of 51 days. The percentage exceeding (0%) was less than (passing) the 10% impairment threshold used to assess conventional water quality parameters. The associated statistical analysis confidence level was high (>90%). The 16-hour DO criterion (7 mg/L) was exceeded in 4 of 51 days. The percentage exceeding (7.8%) was less than (passing) the 10% threshold; however, the statistical analysis confidence level was not high (<90%). Based on these data, the BCW1 aquatic life use is assessed as not impaired for DO. The assessment type is “evaluated” because it is based on data collected from a single year within the current data assessment period. In order to meet the requirements for a “monitored” assessment, the DNR’s continuous monitoring assessment methodology requires monitoring data from two or more years within the assessment period.
Continuous stream temperature monitoring data collected in 2012 for the DNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project at stations 11310006 and 11310005 were examined for temperature criteria violations. At station 11310006, the maximum stream temperature recorded during the sensor deployment period was 18.6 degrees (C). The BCW1 temperature criterion of 20 (C) was exceeded in 0 of 51 days. The percentage exceeding (0%) was less than (passing) the 10% impairment threshold with high statistical confidence (>90%). At station 11310005, the maximum daily temperature was 27.3 degrees (C). The BCW1 temperature criterion of 20 (C) was exceeded in 78 of 111 days between 6/21/2012 and 10/9/2012. The percentage exceeding (70%) was greater than (failing) the 10% impairment threshold with high statistical confidence (>90%). Based on these data, the BCW1 use is assessed as impaired for water temperature. The assessment type is “evaluated” because it is based on data collected from a single year within the current data assessment period. In order to meet the requirements for a “monitored” assessment, the DNR’s continuous monitoring assessment methodology requires monitoring data from two or more years within the assessment period.
The substantially different continuous monitoring results obtained from stations 11310006 and 11310005 suggest that the stream temperature regime is not consistent throughout the entire stream segment. Additional continuous monitoring and an assessment of coldwater inputs (e.g., groundwater seeps and springs) in the vicinity of the sampling sites might be needed to determine whether the BCW1 use is the appropriate designated use for the entire segment or just certain areas within the segment.