Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Drainage Ditch 71 IA 03-SSK-963

mouth (SE1/4 S11 T86N R24W Hamilton Co.) to confluence of Rahto Brach Ditch and Loop Branch Ditch in SE1/4 SE 1/4 S18 T87N R24W Hamilton Co.

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
General Use
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 3b
Legacy ADBCode
IA 03-SSK-0100_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) monitoring in 1997: FIBI = 20 (poor), BMIBI = 41 (fair). Non-riffle FIBI BIC = 32, BMIBI BIC = 62.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The general aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "paritally supported"  based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 1997.

EXPLANATION: This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 1997 as part of the DNR/UHL stream REMAP project.   A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2003 FIBI score was 20 (poor) and the BMIBI score was 41 (fair).  The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The non-riffle FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62.   Even though this site failed both the FIBI and BMIBI BICs, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small general use stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
10/9/1997 Biological Monitoring
10/9/1997 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Cause Unknown Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Organic enrichment/Low DO Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Habitat Modification (other than Hydromodification)
  • Hydromodification
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Unionized Ammonia Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Spills
  • Moderate