Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Hickory Grove Lake IA 03-SSK-950

Story County S24T83NR22W 2.5 mi SW of Colo.

Assessment Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
12/27/2021 10:20:35 AM
Updated
1/5/2022 10:43:36 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2022 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Not Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Delisted
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Cycle Delisted
2022
Delisting Rationale
TMDL preparation and approval
Data Source
TMDL monitoring: Iowa DNR
Turbidity: Secchi Disk Transparency
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2022
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
TMDL Priority
Tier I
Class BLW
Fully Supported
Class HH
Fully Supported
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2016 Class A1 Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded Iowa’s water quality standard and aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by non-algal turbidity. The Class BLW use was assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.” The Class HH (fish consumption) use was assessed as "fully supported" based on fish tissue sampling data. Note: A TMDL for indicator bacteria E. coli at Hickory Grove Lake was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in June 2020. Because not all of the section 303(d) impairments identified for the current assessment/listing cycle (Turbidity) are addressed in the TMDL. This waterbody remains in Category 5a (impaired; TMDL required) for the current assessment/listing cycle.

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2016-2018

22850001

Hickory Grove Lake (maximum water depth)

Iowa DNR

6

FT

See Below

302

Hickory Grove Lake

Hickory Grove Park

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data. See previous assessments.

Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22850001

6

9 / 3

7.4

8.7

8.2

0

3

NO

Evaluated

Full

Class A1 - Lake TSI's:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22850001

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

9 / 3

36

66

58

NO

Monitored

Full

22850001

6

Secchi TSI

9 / 3

40

70

65

YES

Monitored

Not

22850001

6

Total Phosphorus TSI

9 / 3

44

85

63

NA

NA

NA

22850001

6

Inorganic suspended solids

9 / 3

0.6

10

3

NA

NA

NA

DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment. The chlorophyll a TSI value for the 2016 assessment listing cycle was 65, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions. Because the TSI value for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65 (2020 listing for chlorophyll a was 60), and because the TSI value for the current listing cycle is also 58, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for chlorophyll a is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22850001

6

Ammonia

9 / 3

0.0003

0.135

0.06

NA

0 / 0

3

NO

Evaluated

Full

22850001

6

Dissolved Oxygen

9 / 3

3.6

11.6

9.3

1

NA / NA

3

NO

Evaluated

Full

22850001

6

pH

9 / 3

7.4

8.7

8.2

0

NA / NA

3

NO

Evaluated

Full

22850001

6

Temperature

9 / 3

19.8

28

23.6

0

NA / NA

3

NO

Evaluated

Full

Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples

Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Median Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Concentration = 75th Percentile

Assessment Type

Support Level

22850001

6

5

54.47

95.8%

4.65

29.9%

NO

Evaluated

NA

Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling:

Site ID

Biopart

Year

Species

# in sample / # of samples

Avg Length (cm)

(Avg) Hg (ppm)

Chlordane (ppm)

Sum PCBs (ppm)

302

fillet

2013

channel catfish

5

45

0.09

<0.2

<0.6

302

tissue plug

2013

largemouth bass

5

32.9

0.239

Support Level

Full

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
6/20/2016 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/11/2018 Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/2/2013 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/16/2013 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
260 Fish tissue analysis
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring