Assessment is based on: (1) the results of monthly monitoring from 2008 through 2010 at the IDNR/UHL ambient city monitoring station located upstream from Ames at the Sleepy Hollow canoe access (station 10850003), (2) results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring in 2000 & 2003; and (3) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring in 2004.
Basis for Assessment
SUMMARY: The Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to high levels of indicator bacteria that violate state water quality criteria. The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of (1) biological monitoring in 2000 & 2003 by IDNR/UHL and (2) ambient chemical/physical monitoring by IDNR/UHL from 2008-2010. Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2004. The sources of data for this assessment include (1) the results of monthly monitoring from 2008 through 2010 at the IDNR/UHL ambient city monitoring station located upstream from Ames at the Sleepy Hollow canoe access (station 10850003), (2) results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring in 2000 & 2003; and (3) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring in 2004.
EXPLANATION: The Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of monitoring for indicator bacteria (E. coli) during recreational seasons of 2008 through 2010. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 21 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2008 through 2010 at IDNR station 10850003 upstream from Ames were as follows: the 2008 geometric mean was 182 orgs/100 ml, the 2009 geometric mean was 273 orgs/100 ml and the 2010 geometric mean was 483 orgs/100 ml. All three geometric means slightly exceed the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Ten of the 21 samples (48%) exceeded the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean exceeds the respective water quality criterion, the contact recreation uses are "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as “impaired.”
The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of both chemical/physical and biological monitoring. Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring during the 2008-10 period at the IDNR ambient station upstream from Ames showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, or ammonia-nitrogen in the approximately 30 samples collected. These results suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.
Results of biological monitoring in 2000 and 2003 also suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses of this river segment. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of fish species and benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate community index of biotic integrity (BMIBI). The indices rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2000 FIBI score was 40 (fair). The 2003 FIBI scores were 54 (good), 44 (fair). The 2003 BMIBI scores were 76 (excellent) and 65 (good). The aquatic life use support was assessed as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 3/3 times in the last nine years and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/2 times in the last 11 years. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 11 years (2000-2010); however, the multiple samples were not collected during a recent five-year period. Additionally, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).
Fish consumption remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring conducted in 2004 near Story City. Because these data are now more than five years old, and because as data age beyond five years they are less able to represent current water quality conditions, the assessment type is changed from “monitored” (a higher confidence assessment) to “evaluated” (lower confidence assessment.) The composite samples of fillets from common carp and smallmouth bass had low levels of contaminants. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of common carp fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.069 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.031 ppm. Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of smallmouth bass fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.109 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: < 0.03 ppm. The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses. The levels of contaminants in the fish tissue samples collected in 2004 do not exceed any of the new (2006) advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.