Lake Keomah IA 03-SSK-930
Mahaska County S13T75NR15W 4.5 mi E of Oskaloosa.
- Cycle
- 2022
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trophic
- Eutrophic
- Trend
- Stable
- Created
- 12/27/2021 9:27:46 AM
- Updated
- 1/5/2022 10:23:16 AM
The Class A1 use was assessed as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (IR 5a) and "not supported” due to poor water transparency caused by non-algal turbidity (IR 4a). The Class BLW use was assessed as “WINOFI” based on cyanobacteria blooms. The Class C use was assessed as “fully supported” based on water quality monitoring data. The Class HH (fish consumption) use remains assessed as "not supported" based on fish tissue sampling data and due to the existence of a fish consumption advisory at this lake (IR 5a). Note: A TMDL for siltation at Lake Keomah was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in 2002. In September 2012, DNR received EPA approval of a TMDL for the impairments of the Class A1 and Class BLW uses caused by algae and pH. Not all of the section 303(d) impairments identified for the current (2018) assessment/listing cycle (indicator bacteria, mercury), however, are addressed in the TMDL. Thus, this waterbody remains in Category 5a (impaired; TMDL required) for the current assessment/listing cycle.
Data Sources: Data Source Data Source ID Data Type Data Age Site ID Site Name Site Description Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2018-2020 21620001 Lake Keomah Beach
(Lake Keomah State Park) Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2016-2020 22620002 Lake Keomah Lake Deep Point Iowa DNR 6 FT See Below 168 Lake Keomah Near Oskaloosa
Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020) 2018 Geometric Mean 2019 Geometric Mean 2020 Geometric Mean Violates Annual Geometric Mean? # 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment # 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment # 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 21620001 6 13/15/15 49 64 103 NO 2 / 4 4 / 4 3 / 4 YES Monitored Not 22620002 6 3/3/3 4 5 37 NO 0 / NA 0 / NA 0 / NA NO Evaluated Full Class A1 - pH: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 22620002 6 15 / 5 7.4 9.2 8.5 2 4 NO Monitored Full Class A1 - Lake TSI's: Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Median Value Median TSI Violation? Assessment Type Support Level 22620002 6 Chlorophyll a TSI 15 / 5 37 78 62 NO Monitored Full 22620002 6 Secchi TSI 15 / 5 44 81 73 YES Monitored Not 22620002 6 Total Phosphorus TSI 15 / 5 50 80 72 NA NA NA 22620002 6 Inorganic suspended solids 15 / 5 0.3 18 3.2 NA NA NA DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two
assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are
necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment. The Secchi depth
TSI value for the 2016 assessment listing cycle was 65, which based on DNR's
assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative
criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions.Because the
TSI value for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65
(2020 listing for Secchi depth a was 63), and because the TSI value for the
current listing cycle is also 62, based on DNR's methodology, these values
suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against
aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for Secchi depth
is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle. Class BLW - Conventional Parameters: Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations # Acute / Chronic Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 22620002 6 Ammonia 15 / 5 0.0003 0.5801 0.1 NA 0 / 0 4 NO Monitored Full 22620002 6 Dissolved Oxygen 14 / 5 5.1 13.4 9.2 0 NA / NA 4 NO Monitored Full 22620002 6 pH 15 / 5 7.4 9.2 8.5 2 NA / NA 4 NO Monitored Full 22620002 6 Temperature 15 / 5 20.2 29.7 24.7 0 NA / NA 4 NO Monitored Full Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass Median Cyanobacteria % Composition Median Cyanobacteria Concentration = 75th Percentile Assessment Type Support Level 22620002 6 6 74.36 99.3% 15.19 64.2% YES Evaluated 3b Class C - Conventional Parameters: Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value Median Value # Violations Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 22620002 6 Inorganic nitrogen (nitrate and nitrite) 15 / 5 0.02 1.59 0.26 0.03 0 NO Monitored Full 22620002 6 pH 15 / 5 7.4 9.2 8.5 8.5 2 NO Monitored Full Class HH - Fish
Tissue Sampling: Site ID Biopart Year Species # in sample / # of samples Avg Length (cm) (Avg) Hg (ppm) Chlordane (ppm) Sum PCBs (ppm) 168 tissue plug 2015 largemouth bass 4 38.8 0.3
Support Level Not A one meal/week mercury consumption advisory for
largemouth bass exists on this lake. Based on IR Methodology, the Class HH
(fish consumption) use was assessed as “not supported.”