Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Lake Keomah IA 03-SSK-930

Mahaska County S13T75NR15W 4.5 mi E of Oskaloosa.

Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
12/27/2021 9:27:46 AM
Updated
1/5/2022 10:23:16 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Beach monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
TMDL Priority
Tier II
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Other: Sediment Resuspension
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2022
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2022
Impairment Rationale
Adverse impacts on plant/animal communities
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
Class C
Drinking Water -
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Moderate
Cycle Added
2012
Impairment Rationale
Fish consumption advisory in effect: no more than 1 meal/week
Data Source
Fish contaminant monitoring: Iowa DNR
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (IR 5a) and "not supported” due to poor water transparency caused by non-algal turbidity (IR 4a). The Class BLW use was assessed as “WINOFI” based on cyanobacteria blooms. The Class C use was assessed as “fully supported” based on water quality monitoring data. The Class HH (fish consumption) use remains assessed as "not supported" based on fish tissue sampling data and due to the existence of a fish consumption advisory at this lake (IR 5a). Note: A TMDL for siltation at Lake Keomah was prepared by DNR and approved by EPA in 2002. In September 2012, DNR received EPA approval of a TMDL for the impairments of the Class A1 and Class BLW uses caused by algae and pH. Not all of the section 303(d) impairments identified for the current (2018) assessment/listing cycle (indicator bacteria, mercury), however, are addressed in the TMDL. Thus, this waterbody remains in Category 5a (impaired; TMDL required) for the current assessment/listing cycle.

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2018-2020

21620001

Lake Keomah Beach (Lake Keomah State Park)

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2016-2020

22620002

Lake Keomah

Lake Deep Point

Iowa DNR

6

FT

See Below

168

Lake Keomah

Near Oskaloosa

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020)

2018 Geometric Mean

2019 Geometric Mean

2020 Geometric Mean

Violates Annual Geometric Mean?

# 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

21620001

6

13/15/15

49

64

103

NO

2 / 4

4 / 4

3 / 4

YES

Monitored

Not

22620002

6

3/3/3

4

5

37

NO

0 / NA

0 / NA

0 / NA

NO

Evaluated

Full

Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22620002

6

15 / 5

7.4

9.2

8.5

2

4

NO

Monitored

Full

Class A1 - Lake TSI's:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22620002

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

15 / 5

37

78

62

NO

Monitored

Full

22620002

6

Secchi TSI

15 / 5

44

81

73

YES

Monitored

Not

22620002

6

Total Phosphorus TSI

15 / 5

50

80

72

NA

NA

NA

22620002

6

Inorganic suspended solids

15 / 5

0.3

18

3.2

NA

NA

NA

DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment. The Secchi depth TSI value for the 2016 assessment listing cycle was 65, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions.Because the TSI value for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65 (2020 listing for Secchi depth a was 63), and because the TSI value for the current listing cycle is also 62, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for Secchi depth is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22620002

6

Ammonia

15 / 5

0.0003

0.5801

0.1

NA

0 / 0

4

NO

Monitored

Full

22620002

6

Dissolved Oxygen

14 / 5

5.1

13.4

9.2

0

NA / NA

4

NO

Monitored

Full

22620002

6

pH

15 / 5

7.4

9.2

8.5

2

NA / NA

4

NO

Monitored

Full

22620002

6

Temperature

15 / 5

20.2

29.7

24.7

0

NA / NA

4

NO

Monitored

Full

Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples

Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Median Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Concentration = 75th Percentile

Assessment Type

Support Level

22620002

6

6

74.36

99.3%

15.19

64.2%

YES

Evaluated

3b

Class C - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22620002

6

Inorganic nitrogen (nitrate and nitrite)

15 / 5

0.02

1.59

0.26

0.03

0

NO

Monitored

Full

22620002

6

pH

15 / 5

7.4

9.2

8.5

8.5

2

NO

Monitored

Full

Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling:

Site ID

Biopart

Year

Species

# in sample / # of samples

Avg Length (cm)

(Avg) Hg (ppm)

Chlordane (ppm)

Sum PCBs (ppm)

168

tissue plug

2015

largemouth bass

4

38.8

0.3

Support Level

Not

A one meal/week mercury consumption advisory for largemouth bass exists on this lake. Based on IR Methodology, the Class HH (fish consumption) use was assessed as “not supported.”

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
6/22/2016
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/9/2020
Fixed Monitoring End Date
10/28/2002
TMDL Completed
9/24/2012
TMDL Completed
7/24/2015
Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
260
Fish tissue analysis
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)