Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Geode Lake IA 03-SKU-896

Henry County S36T70NR5W 4 mi. SW of Danville.

Assessment Cycle
2002
Result Period
1998 - 2000
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 0
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 03-SKU-00650-L_0
Overall Use Support
Threatened
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Threatened
Drinking Water
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on results of (1) IDNR beach monitoring program, (2) ISU lake survey in 2000-01, (2) surveys by IDNR Fisheries Bureau, (3) ISU report on lake plankton communities, and (4) results of U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue monitoring in 1996.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A (primary contact recreation uses) were assessed as "fully supported."  The Class B(LW) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported / threatened."  The Class C (drinking water) uses remain "not assessed."  Fish consumption uses remain assessed as "fully supported."  EXPLANATION:  Levels of indicator bacteria at Lake Geode beach were monitored once per week during the primary contact recreation seasons (April through October) of 2000 and 2001 as part of the IDNR beach monitoring program.   According to U.S.  EPA guidelines for determining support of primary contact recreation uses (U.S.  EPA 1997b, page 3-35), the geometric mean of fecal coliform bacteria level from at least five samples collected over a 30-day period is compared to the water quality standard of 200 fecal organisms/100ml.   If a 30-day geometric mean exceeds 200 orgs/100 ml, the primary contact recreation uses are assessed as "not supported."  In addition, the U.S.  EPA guidelines state that if more than 10% of the total samples taken during any 30-day period has a bacterial density that exceeds 400 fecal coliform organsims/100 ml, the primary contact recreation uses are assessed as "partially supported."  Due to the relatively low numbers of samples collected during any 30-day period (N=5), the use of single-sample maximum values to assess beaches is problematic.   With less than 10 samples collected during any 30-day period at Iowa beaches, the occurrence of a single level of bacteria above the single-sample maximum value will result in more than 10% violation of the single-sample maximum value and thus suggest impairment of the primary contact recreation uses.   The use of less than 10 samples in an assessment based on a critical value of 10% results in large probabilities (approximately 60%) of incorrectly concluding that an impairment exists.   For this reason, the single-sample maximum value is not used to assess support of primary contact recreation uses with data from the IDNR beach monitoring program.   At Lake Geode beach, none of the 27 thirty-day periods during summers of 2000 and 2001 had geometric means (N = 5 samples per period) greater than 200 orgs/100ml.   The maximum 30-day geometric means were 67 orgs/100ml in 2000 and 64 orgs/100 ml in 2001.   One of the weekly samples in 2000 and in 2001 (6% of samples) exceeded the U.S.  EPA's recommended single-sample maximum value of 400 orgs/100 ml (maximum sample values were 2,200 orgs/100 ml in 2000 and 960 orgs/100 ml in 2001).   These results suggest (1) full support of primary contact recreation uses at this beach and (2) that levels of bacteria at this beach are generally very low.   The previous assessment of support of the Class B(LW) uses ("fully supported / threatened") was reviewed and approved by the DNR Fisheries Bureau.   The Class C (drinking water) uses remained "not assessed" due to the lack of water quality information.   Fish consumption uses remained assessed as "fully supported" based on results of EPA/DNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring in 1996 (see assessment developed for the 1998 report).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/10/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
5/22/2000 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
8/26/1996 Biological Monitoring
Methods
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Nutrients Overall Use Support Not Impairing
  • Natural Sources
  • Nonirrigated Crop Production
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Natural Sources
  • Nonirrigated Crop Production
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Nutrients Primary Contact Recreation Not Impairing
  • Natural Sources
  • Nonirrigated Crop Production
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Siltation Overall Use Support Not Impairing
  • Natural Sources
  • Nonirrigated Crop Production
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Natural Sources
  • Nonirrigated Crop Production
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing