Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Skunk River IA 03-SKU-889

mouth to confluence with Big Cr. southeast of Mt. Pleasant in S19 T70N R5W in Henry Co.

Assessment Cycle
2016
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
9/26/2016 2:34:37 PM
Updated
2/9/2017 10:50:39 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2016 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Not Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2012
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Not Assigned
Class BWW1
WINOFI
Biological: low aquatic macroinvertebrate IBI
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class HH
WINOFI
Pesticides: Dieldrin
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b - Use potentially impaired based on an evaluated assessment.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture: Crop Production
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2012
Impairment Rationale
Potential Impairment
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: USGS
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supporting” (IR 5a) due to levels of indicator bacteria that slightly exceed state criteria. The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" (IR 3b-u) based on results IDNR/SHL stream REMAP biological sampling in 2006 near Burlington and stream nutrient sampling in 2012 and 2013 near Augusta. Although results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2005, 2006, and 2010 suggest “full support” of fish consumption uses, results of USGS monitoring show that levels of dieldrin occasionally exceed Iowa’s Human-Health/fish criterion and indicate that these uses should be assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting” (IR 3b). The sources of data for this assessment include (1) USGS NAWQA monitoring from February 2010 through December 2012 at station 05474000 near Augusta, (2) IDNR ambient monitoring from October 2010 to June 2012 at station 10560002, (3) U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring in 2006, 2007, and 2010, (4) fish contaminant monitoring conducted as part of the IDNR/SHL REMAP biological monitoring project in 2006 (REMAP Site 194), and (5) IDNR/SHL biological sampling in 2006 near Burlington and in 2012 and 2013 near Augusta.

Assessment Explanation

[Note: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this river segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf) and due to the completion of a Use Attainability Analysis in 2007, this segment is also now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses).]

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) are assessed as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 22 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2012 through 2014 at USGS station 05474000 at Augusta, IA, were as follows: the 2012 geometric mean was 43 orgs/100 ml, the 2013 geometric mean was 60 orgs/100 ml, and the 2014 geometric mean was 79 orgs/100 ml. All three geometric means are below (meet) the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Three of the 22 samples (13%) exceeded the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.  At IDNR ambient station 10560002, too few bacteria samples were collected during the recreation seasons of 2012 and 2014 (total of 5 samples) to calculate meaningful geometric means. No samples were collected during the recreation season of 2013.  

According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if all recreation season geometric means are below the the respective geometric mean criterion, and if the percentage of samples that exceed the Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion is not greater than 10%, the contact recreation uses should be assessed as "fully supporting" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because all recreation season geometric means met the Class A1 geometric mean criterion, and because the percentage of samples not meeting the single-sample criterion was not significantly greater than 10%, the Class A1 uses of this assessment segment should be assessed as "fully supporting.  The IDNR assessment/listing methodology, however, requires that, before an IR Category 5 bacterial impairment can be de-listed, geometric mean levels of E. coli must all be less than the applicable state water quality criteria for two consecutive listing cycles (i.e., five consecutive years).  Thus, the bacteria impairment of the Class A1 uses will remain in effect.

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses should be assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of USGS and IDNR monitoring from 2012 through 2014. Results of USGS and IDNR monitoring at this station from February 2012 through December 2014 show no violations of Class B(WW1) criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, or ammonia in the approximately 40 combined samples analyzed at these stations. None of the 41 samples analyzed for chloride and sulfate at the IDNR monitoring station exceeded their respective Class B(WW) criteria. In addition, none of the 31 samples analyzed by USGS for chlorphyrifos, DDE, or dieldrin exceeded their respective Class B(WW1) aquatic life criteria. Sixteen of the 938 readings of water temperature (2%) exceeded the Class B(WW1) criterion of temperature of 32C. According to EPA assessment guidelines and IDNR’s assessment methodology, a violation frequency of less than 10% for conventional parameters such as water temperature does not indicate impairment of aquatic life uses. Thus, these results suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.

In contrast to the USGS WQ monitoring, the results of IDNR/SHL stream biological sampling in 2006, 2012 and 2013 suggest "partial support" of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 2006, 2012 and 2013 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream REMAP and stream nutrient sampling projects. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2006 FIBI score was 41 (fair) and the 2006 BMIBI score was 45 (fair). The 2012 BMIBI scores were 29 (poor) and 45 (fair). The 2013 BMIBI scores were 36 and 45 (both fair).  The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36 (2006 sample) and the BMIBI BIC for the 2006 sample is 51.  The BMIBI BIC for 2012 & 2013 samples is 41. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (4342 and 4303 mi2) above the sampling sites were far greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site passed the FIBI BIC and failed the BMIBI BIC (2/5), it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the sites used for the assessment don’t fall in the calibrated watershed size. According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).

The Human Health designated use (including the fish consumption use) remains assessed (evaluated) as “partially supporting” (IR Category 3b-potentially impaired) based on USGS monitoring from 2010-2012. Although all of the 31 samples analyzed for dieldrin during the 2012-2014 period had levels of dieldrin below the detection level (0.008 ug/l), six of 32 samples analyzed for dieldrin by USGS at station 05474000 during previous (2010-2012) monitoring period exceeded the Iowa human health-fish (HH-fish) criterion of 0.00054 ppb (=54 parts per trillion). According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the mean level of a toxic metal or pesticide is greater than its respective human health criterion, impairment ("nonsupport") of the Human Health use is indicated. However, the samples with detectable levels of dieldrin were too few (six: two detected values (0.003 & 0.005 ug/l) and four values estimated at 0.002 ug/l), and the method detection level (0.008 ug/l) was too high (~15 times the HH criterion for dieldrin) to allow calculation of a meaningful summary statistic (e.g., mean) for dieldrin at USGS station 05474000.  Regardless, the infrequent occurrence of dieldrin in water is of concern and thus suggests that the Human Health uses should remain assessed as “potentially impaired” and remain included in Category 3b of Iowa’s Integrated Report.  The only other Human Health parameter monitored for by USGS during the 2012-2014 at station 05474000 was DDE.  None of the 31 samples analyzed contained a detectable level of this contaminant.

Despite the violations of Iowa’s human-health/fish criterion for dieldrin during the 2010-2012 monitoring period, the results of recent fish contaminant sampling in this river segment conducted as part of the U.S. EPA/IDNR RAFT program show low levels of dieldrin in Skunk River fish.  Results of Iowa DNR fish contaminant monitoring in this segment show 15 ppb of dieldrin in the composite sample of common carp fillets analyzed in 2005, 10 ppb of dieldrin in the composite sample of common carp fillets analyzed in 2007, 44 ppb in the composite sample of whole-fish common carp analyzed in 2010, and 30 ppb in the composite sample of whole-fish common carp analyzed in 2014. Although Iowa does not have an advisory trigger level for dieldrin, the levels seen in the 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2014 are well below the Iowa’s previous advisory trigger of 300 ppb of dieldrin (i.e., the U.S. FDA action level for dieldrin). Levels of dieldrin in Iowa fish have declined significantly since the early and mid-1980s when levels of 300 ppb were not uncommon. Fish tissue samples from this station in the early and mid-1980s averaged over 150 ppm of dieldrin.

Fish contaminant monitoring for toxic parameters other than dieldrin (e.g., mercury, PCBs, and chlordane) suggest “full support” of fish consumption uses. This site has been sampled for whole-fish common carp since 1995 on an every-other-year basis as part of Iowa DNR trend monitoring (note: trend samples were not collected in 2012 due to low water conditions). The 2006 composite whole-fish samples of common carp had similar levels of these contaminants: mercury: 0.191 ppm; total PCBs: 0.133 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.046 ppm. The 2007 composite samples of common carp fillets had low levels of the primary contaminants: mercury: 0.208 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. The composite samples of white bass fillets also had low levels of mercury (0.152 ppm). The 2010 composite samples of whole fish samples of common carp had low levels of primary contaminants: mercury: 0.117 ppm; total PCBs: 0.162 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.092 ppm.  Similarly, the 2014 whole-fish carp composite sample hat 0.117 ppm of mercury; <0.24 ppm of total PCBs, and <0.05 ppm of technical chlordane.  Results of fish contaminant monitoring conducted in this assessment segment in September 2006 as part of the IDNR/UHL REMAP project (Site 194) showed similar results in the composite samples of common carp fillets: mercury: 0.218 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.

The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses. The fish contaminant data generated from the 2006, 2007, 2010, and 2014 samplings and the fish tissue data collected as part of the IDNR/SHL REMAP project conducted at this river show that the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the advisory trigger levels, thus indicating no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody. Due, however, to the low frequency with which violations of the human health (fish + water) dieldrin criterion occurs, the assessment of the HH-fish consumption uses in this river segment is considered appropriate for Iowa’s IR Category 3b (potential impairment). IR Category 3b waters will be added to Iowa’s list of waters in need of further investigation.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/7/2006 Biological Monitoring
10/8/2012 Biological Monitoring
10/8/2013 Biological Monitoring
8/16/2006 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/7/2006 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/27/2007 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/27/2007 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/17/2010 Fish Tissue Monitoring
1/4/2012 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/31/2014 Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quantitative physical habitat assessment
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring