Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

North Fork Maquoketa River IA 01-NMQ-88

mouth (Jackson Co.) to confluence with Lytle Cr. S8 T85N R2E Jackson Co.

Assessment Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
12/21/2021 12:31:47 PM
Updated
1/7/2022 3:29:32 PM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2022 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Not Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5p - Impairment occurs on a waterbody with a presumptive A1 or B(WW1) use.
Cause Magnitude
High
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
Not Supported
Fish Kill: Caused By Animal Waste
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5b - Biological impairment or pollutant-caused fish kill - unknown source. No administrative action.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Agriculture: Manure Runoff
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2018
Impairment Rationale
Pollutant-caused fish kill
Data Source
Fish kill investigation: Iowa DNR
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class HH
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceed state water quality criteria. The Class BWW1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to a fish kill investigation. All other designated uses were "not assessed."

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2018-2020

10490001

North Fork Maquoketa River near Hurstville

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

282

North Fork Maquoketa River

Maquoketa/Hurtsville


Presumptive Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020)

2018 Geometric Mean

2019 Geometric Mean

2020 Geometric Mean

Violates Annual Geometric Mean?

# 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10490001

6

7/7/8

689

1118

321

YES

5 / 3

5 / 3

5 / 3

YES

Monitored

Not


Class A - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10490001

6

36 / 3

7.2

8.4

8.1

0

7

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10490001

6

Ammonia

36 / 3

0.025

1.2

0.1

NA

0 / 0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Chloride

36 / 3

7.4

24

19.2

NA

0 / 0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Dissolved Oxygen

36 / 3

6.6

14.2

10.3

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

pH

36 / 3

7.2

8.4

8.1

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Sulfate

36 / 3

7.4

25

17.9

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Temperature

36 / 3

0

26.1

11.4

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

>1 Acute / Chronic Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

10490001

6

Aluminum

14 / 3

31

4.26

0.92

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Arsenic

13 / 3

1.5

0.9

0.8

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Cadmium

13 / 3

0.08

0.03

0.02

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Chromium

13 / 3

1.7

1.2

1.2

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Lead

13 / 3

0.62

0.17

0.12

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Nickel

13 / 3

3.9

2.7

2.5

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Silver

13 / 3

0.025

0.025

0.025

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10490001

6

Zinc

13 / 3

10

2.76

2

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Biological Sampling:


Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage

BM Sample Gear

BMIBI score

BMIBI Class

47f BMIBI BIT

BMIBI Pass/ Fail

282

8/7/20

590

47f

MS

Floating Art Sub

61

Good

51

Pass

282

9/7/16

590

47f

MS

Floating Art Sub

67

Good

51

Pass

Overall:

Community

Assessment Type

Assessment Result

Support Level

IR Category

Reason

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Evaluated

Pass (2/2)

Full

Assessment was evaluated because the drainage area of the sample site

Overall

Evaluated

Pass

Full

1

was greater than the calibrated range.


Class BWW1 - Fish kill Assessment:
The Class BWW1 aquatic life use assessment based on the 2016 fish kill placed this segment in Category 5b. The fish kill was caused by a “pollutant” or was suspected to be caused by a “pollutant”; therefore, the Class BWW1 use was considered impaired. Because the source of the pollutant was not identified and/or the enforcement actions taken against the responsible party have not been resolved, the Class BWW1 use was placed in Category 5b. Due to uncertainty regarding the recovery of the aquatic life following the fish kill, any existing fish kill 5b impairment will remain in Category 5b until more recent sampling has shown recovery of the aquatic community or the responsible party has paid restitution.

Details about the 2016 fish kill can be found here: https://programs.iowadnr.gov/fishkill/Events/916

Class BWW1 - Nutrient Impact Assessment:
Monitoring data collected from the DNR/SHL ambient fixed station near Hurtsville (10490001) during the 2010-2014 data assessment period were sufficient to complete a Nutrient Impact Assessment (NIA). Data analysis methods and screening benchmark values for nutrient stressor and response parameters described in the DNR’s 2016 NIA methodology were used to examine for nutrient impacts often associated with low biotic index scores and violations of dissolved oxygen (DO) criteria. Nutrient stressor: The median concentration of total phosphorus (TP) was 0.22 mg/L among samples collected during the June 15- October 15 index period. The TP benchmark (0.10 mg/L) was exceeded in 18 of 20 samples. The percentage exceeding (90%) was greater than (failing) the 50% threshold with high statistical confidence (> 90%). Nutrient response parameter: The median concentration of algal chlorophyll A suspended in water (WCHLA) was 11 ug/L. The WCHLA benchmark (20 ug/L) was exceeded in 2 of 20 samples. The percentage exceeding (10%) was less than (passing) the 50% threshold with high statistical confidence (> 90%). The median rating of filamentous algae coverage (FLMA) on hard substrates was 0 (absent). The FLMA benchmark (3; 50%-75%) was exceeded in 0 of 8 observations. The percentage exceeding (0%) was less than (passing) the 50% threshold with high statistical confidence (> 90%).

The results of this “evaluated” assessment indicate the presence of elevated levels of the nutrient stressor parameter (TP) and low levels of the nutrient response parameters, WCHLA and FLMA. This combination of results is interpreted as representing a moderate risk of aquatic life use impairment due to nutrient enrichment. Continuous monitoring data were not available to examine for violations of DO criteria; however, the benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI) results described suggest full attainment of aquatic life uses. Based on the assessed risk level, the stream segment is considered a moderate priority for follow-up nutrient impact monitoring.

Class HH - No Data

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/7/2020 Biological Monitoring
1/9/2018 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/1/2020 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/7/2016 Biological Monitoring
9/19/2016 Fish Kill
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
140 Incidence of spills and/or fish kills
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring