Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

North Skunk River IA 03-NSK-863

from confluence with Sugar Cr. (S20 T78N R16W Poweshiek Co.) to confluence with Snipe Cr. in S22 T81N R19W Jasper Co.

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 4c
Legacy ADBCode
IA 03-NSK-0030_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) monitoring in 2001: Fish IBI = 17, 19, 16 (all poor); BM-IBI = 65, 71, 70 (all good) and on 2002 Fisheries data: Fish IBI = 24 (poor).

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported"  based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 2001 and IDNR Fisheries sampling in 2002.   This is the same assessment as that developed for the 2002 reporting cycle except for the addtion of the Fisheries data.

EXPLANATION:  The assessment was based on data collected in 2001 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project and on 2002 Manchester Fisheries stream sampling data.   A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (F-IBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BM-IBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2001 Fish IBI scores were 17 (poor), 19 (poor) and 16 (poor); the BM-IBI scores were 65 (good), 71 (good) and 70 (good).  The 2002 Fisheries Fish IBI score was 24 (poor).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the F-IBI and BM-IBI scores with biological assessment criteria established specifically for the 2002 Section 305(b) report.  The biological assessment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2001.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
1/1/2002 Biological Monitoring
8/9/2001 Biological Monitoring
8/9/2001 One-time Chemical Monitoring
8/8/2001 Biological Monitoring
8/8/2001 One-time Chemical Monitoring
8/7/2001 Biological Monitoring
8/7/2001 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 4
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Channelization
  • Hydromodification
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate