Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

North Skunk River IA 03-NSK-859

from the Mahaska/Poweshiek line to confluence with Sugar Cr. in S20 T78N R16W Poweshiek Co.

Assessment Cycle
2010
Result Period
2006 - 2008
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-2)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 5b-t
Legacy ADBCode
IA 03-NSK-0020_2
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on 2001 IDNR/UHL biological monitoring data: FIBI = 15 (poor), BMIBI = 74 (good). FIBI BIC = 36, BMIBI BIC = 51.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.   EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses).   Thus, for the current (2010) assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 2001.   The 2001 sampling data are now greater than five years old; therefore, this assessment is now considered "evaluated" instead of "monitored".  

EXPLANATION:  The assessment was based on data collected in 2001 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.   A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2001 FIBI score was 15 (poor) and the BMIBI score was 74 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.   The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 51.

This aquatic life assessment is considered "evaluated" because there were not two or more samples collected from this segment in multiple years from 2004-2008.   Additionally, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).   According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report).   IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).   However, despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 5b and remains on Iowa’s 2010 Section 303(d) list of impaired waters.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/6/2001 Biological Monitoring
8/6/2001 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Habitat Modification (other than Hydromodification)
  • Hydromodification
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Suspended solids Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Turbidity Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate