Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Willow Creek IA 02-WIN-848

mouth (SW 1/4 S32 T98N R21W Worth Co.) to headwaters (Worth Co.)

Assessment Cycle
2012
Result Period
2008 - 2010
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-WIN-0073_0
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on 2001 and 2010 IDNR/UHL biological monitoring data: FIBI = 58, 53 (good), BMIBI = 73, 73 (good). Riffle habitat FIBI BIC = 53, BMIBI BIC = 62.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was classified only for general uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and for Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.   According to the Iowa Water Quality Standards, all perennial rivers and streams and all intermittent streams with perennial pools that are not specifically listed in the Iowa surface water classification are designated as Class A1 and Class B(WW1) waters.   Thus, for the current (2010) assessment, perennial flow is presumed, and the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW1) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring in 2001 and 2010.

EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting” based on data collected in 2001 and 2010 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.   The 2001 FIBI score was 58 (good) and the BMIBI score was 73 (good).   The 2010 FIBI score was 53 (good) and the BMIBI score was 73 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 53 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62.   Even though this segment passed the FIBI BIC 2/2 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/2 times in the last 10 years, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small headwater stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.  

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.   IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years between 2006 and 2010 to be considered “monitored”.   This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 10 years (2001-2010); however, the samples were not collected during 2006-2010.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/28/2010 Biological Monitoring
9/4/2001 Biological Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Good