Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Rice Lake IA 02-WIN-832

Winnebago County S13T99NR23W at SE edge of Lake Mills.

Cycle
2020
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
7/29/2020 9:00:36 AM
Updated
10/14/2020 10:19:19 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
New
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2020
Impairment Rationale
Significantly > 10% of samples fail to meet criterion
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
New
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2020
Impairment Rationale
Significantly > 10% of samples fail to meet criterion
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2014 Class A1 Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
2016 Class BLW Algal Growth: Chlorophyll a Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
2014 Class BLW Turbidity Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-shallow lakes & wetlands New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use is assessed as "not supported" due to violations of the Class A1 criterion for pH. The Class BLW use is assessed as "not supported" due to violations of the Class BLW criterion for pH. All other designated uses are “not assessed”.

Assessment Explanation

Sources of Data:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2015-2018

22950001

Rice Lake


Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data


Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

22950001

6

15 / 3

12.39

9.38

9.02

9

60%

YES

Monitored

Not


Class A1 - Lake TSI's

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

22950001

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

20 / 4

24

81

58

NO

Monitored

Full

22950001

6

Inorganic suspended solids

20 / 4

0

50

2

NA

NA

NA

  • The TSI value for Secchi depth is not used to evaluate the attainment of aquatic life goals in shallow lakes. Due to the depth of these shallow lakes, TSI values for Secchi depth can be misleading. In some instances, the Secchi disk remains visible at the bottom of the lake and the depth of the lake is recorded as the Secchi depth. In these instances, water clarity may be sufficient to support the Class B(LW) uses, but the index value is limited by the depth of the lake. Thus the combination of total suspended solids and chlorophyll a will be used to determine whether or not the Class B(LW) uses are impaired in these shallow systems.
  • Class A1 & BLW Delisting:DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a TSI value less than or equal to 63 are necessary to suggest de-listing of an impairment. The chlorophyll a TSI value for the 2014 assessment listing cycle was 79, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment based on the narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions. Because the TSI value for the 2018 assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 65 (2018 listing for chlorophyll a was 63), and because the TSI value for the current listing cycle is also 58, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for chlorophyll a is suggested for delisting for the 2020 assessment/listing cycle.
Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

22950001

6

Ammonia

15 / 3

0.38

0.08

0.02

0 / 2

0% / 13%

NO

Monitored

Full

22950001

6

Dissolved oxygen

15 / 3

11.88

8.85

8.69

NA / 0

NA / 0%

NO

Monitored

Full

22950001

6

pH

15 / 3

12.39

9.38

9.02

9 / NA

60% / NA

YES

Monitored

Not

22950001

6

Temperature

15 / 3

27.6

22.3

23.2

0 / 0

0% / 0%

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BLW - Protection of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median Value >= SAV

Assessment Type

Support Level

22950001

6

Total suspended solids

20 / 4

0.5

85.41

8.5

NO

Monitored

Full

  • Guidelines for wetland assessment from the Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee’s Water Quality Technical Section (2003) state that an average total suspended solids concentration during the growing season of less than 30 mg/L is necessary to provide sufficient water clarity to support the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation in wetlands and shallow lakes. High levels of total suspended solids impede the growth of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV). Submersed aquatic vegetation is critical to the health of wetland and shallow lake ecosystems. The elimination of SAV can degrade habitat quality such that undesirable aquatic species such as cyanobacteria, common carp and fathead minnows dominate. As such, the suppression of SAV constitutes a violation of Iowa’s narrative water quality criteria protecting against undesirable or nuisance aquatic life.
  • Class BLW Delisting:DNR's assessment methodology indicates that at least two assessment/listing cycles with a median growing season total suspended solids concentration of 30 mg/L to suggest de-listing of the SAV impairment. The total suspended solids concentration for the assessment listing cycle was 79, which based on DNR's assessment/listing methodology indicated an impairment. Because the total suspended solids concentration for the assessment/listing cycle was less than the trigger of 30 ( listing for SAV was 63), and because the total suspended solids concentration for the current listing cycle is also 58, based on DNR's methodology, these values suggest "full support" of the Class A1 uses protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions and the impairment (5a) for SAV is suggested for delisting for the assessment/listing cycle.
Class HH - No Data


Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
5/18/2015
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/10/2018
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)