Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

West Fork Cedar River IA 02-WFC-802

from confluence with Maynes Cr. (S7 T91N R17W Butler Co.) to confluence with Hartgrave Cr. in SE 1/4 S34 T92N R18W Butler Co.

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
Class B(WW)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 1
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-WFC-0020_2
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Fully
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on results of (1) IDNR/UHL biocriteria sampling in 1999 and (2) U.S. EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring in 2002.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(WW) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluted) as fully supporting based on results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring in 1999.   Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish contaminant monitoring near Allison in July 2002.  

EXPLANATION:  The assessment of the Class B(WW) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 1999 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.   A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 1999 FIBI score was 70 (good) and the BMIBI score was 55 (fair).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The non-riffle site FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 44 and the artificial substrate BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 52.

Fish consumption uses were assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Allison in 2002.   The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and smallmouth bass had very low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.105 ppm; total PCBs: 0.094 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.045 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of smallmouth bass fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.080 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.  

The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   Prior to 2006, IDNR used action levels published by the U.S Food and Drug Administration to determine whether consumption advisories should be issued for fish caught as part of recreational fishing in Iowa.   In an effort to make Iowa’s consumption more compatible with the various protocols used by adjacent states, the Iowa Department of Public Health, in cooperation with Iowa DNR, developed a risk-based advisory protocol.   This protocol went into effect in January 2006 (see http://www.iowadnr.gov/fish/news/consump.html for more information on Iowa’s revised fish consumption advisory protocol).   Because the revised (2006) protocol is more restrictive than the previous protocol based on FDA action levels; fish contaminant data that previously suggested “full support” may now suggest either a threat to, or impairment of, fish consumption uses.   This scenario, however, does not apply to the fish contaminant data generated from the 2002 RAFT sampling conducted in this segment of the West Fork Cedar River:  the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the new (2006) advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this waterbody.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/30/2002 Fish Tissue Monitoring
10/11/1999 Biological Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Good