Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

West Fork Cedar River IA 02-WFC-801

from confluence with Shell Rock R. (S4 T90N R14W Black Hawk Co.) to confluence with Maynes Cr. in S7 T91N R17W Butler Co.

Assessment Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/23/2019 1:56:20 PM
Updated
7/3/2019 10:28:06 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2018 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Partially Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
WINOFI
Biological: low fish IBI
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2006
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR Fisheries
Class HH
Fully Supported
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria that very slightly violate state water quality criteria.  The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of biological sampling.  Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on fish contaminant monitoring in 2011 and 2012.  Sources of data for this assessment include (1) the results of DNR/SHL ambient monthly water quality monitoring conducted on the West Fork Cedar River at Finchford (DNR station 10070003) during the 2012-2014 assessment period, (2) results of DNR/SHL biological sampling conducted in 2014-2016, (3) results of U.S. EPA/DNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Allison in 2011 and 2012, and (4) DNR Fisheries Bureau fish sampling conducted in 2005. 

Assessment Explanation

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 24 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2014 through 2016 at station 10070003 at Finchford were as follows: the 2014 geometric mean was 74 orgs/100 ml, the 2015 geometric mean was 168 orgs/100 ml, and the 2016 geometric mean was 146 orgs/100 ml. Two of the three recreation season geometric means exceeded the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Seven of the combined 24 samples (29%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as "partially supported."

Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring at station 10070003 at Finchford suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 35 Ammonia samples (maximum = 0.1 mg/L), 36 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 6.4 mg/L), 35 pH samples (range = 7.6 to 8.5), 36 Temperature samples (maximum = 24.1° c), 36 Chloride samples (maximum = 21 mg/L), or 36 Sulfate samples (maximum = 48 mg/L) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to December 2016. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), the EPA guidelines allow up to 10% violations of these conventional parameters before impairment of water quality is indicated. Thus, these results thus suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.

Despite results of chemical/physical monitoring which suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses, results of DNR/SHL biological monitoring from 2012-2014 and DNR Fisheries monitoring in 2005 suggest (evaluated) “partial support” of these uses. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2005 Fisheries FIBI score was 35 (fair). The 2012-2014BMIBI scores were 47 (fair) and 60, 72 (both good). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The non-riffle FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 44 and the artificial substrate BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 52. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 0/1 times in 2005 and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/3 times in the last five years. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage areas (824 and 850 mi2) above the sampling sites were greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. Even though this site failed to meet the FIBI BIC and passed the BMIBI BIC, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the sites used for the assessments don’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.


According to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). DNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/DNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Allison, Iowa, in 2011 and 2012. In the 2011 samples, the composite samples of fillets from channel catfish had low levels of contaminants: mercury: 0.136 ppm; total PCBs: 0.091 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm. The average level of mercury in the tissue plugs from four smallmouth bass was 0.415 ppm (SD=0.099 ppm). This level of mercury exceeded Iowa's threshold for a one-meal per week consumption advisory of 0.3 ppm. According to Iowa’s fish consumption advisory protocol, however, two consecutive samplings that show contaminant levels above an advisory threshold are needed to confirm that an advisory should be issued. Thus, follow-up sampling was conducted in 2012. The results of this follow-up sampling showed that the average level of mercury in the tissue plugs from four smallmouth bass (0.182 ppm; SD=0.077 ppm) was well below the advisory threshold of 0.3 ppm, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory for this river segment. These results suggest continued full support of the fish consumption uses.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/21/2005 Biological Monitoring
9/3/2013 Biological Monitoring
9/16/2011 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/6/2012 Biological Monitoring
9/20/2012 Fish Tissue Monitoring
1/9/2014 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/6/2016 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/9/2014 Biological Monitoring
Methods
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
260 Fish tissue analysis
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring