Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Elk Creek IA 02-SHL-798

mouth to east line of S13 T99N R22W Worth Co.

Assessment Cycle
2012
Result Period
2008 - 2010
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-2)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 3b-c
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-SHL-0030_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on 2000 and 2008 IDNR/UHL biological monitoring data: FIBI = 21 (poor), 47 (fair); BMIBI = 31 (fair), 27 (poor) and 1999 IDNR Fisheries data: FIBI = 33 (fair). Non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC = 32, BMIBI BIC = 62.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses).   Thus, for the current (2012) assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY/EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.  

The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses remain assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of biological monitoring in 1999, 2000 and 2008.   Because of the segment's proximity to the upstream marsh, and the marsh-like qualities of the year site, it was determined to loosely apply the biological criteria and enter this assessment as evaluated.   According to IDNR's assessment methodology, "evaluated" impairments are of relatively lower confidence than “monitored" impairments which have relatively higher confidence.   Such "evaluated" waters, while not appropriate for addition to Category 5 of the Integrated Report (= Section 303(d) list), will be placed in either Category 2b or 3b of the IR and thus will be added to the state’s list of “waters in need of further investigation”.  

The assessment was based on data collected in 2000 and 2008 as part of the IDNR/UHL stream biocriteria project and on 1999 IDNR Fisheries data.   A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 1999 Fisheries FIBI score was 33 (fair).   The 2000 FIBI score was 21 (poor) and the BMIBI score was 31 (fair).   The 2008 FIBI score was 47 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 27 (poor).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.   The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62.   This segment passed the FIBI BIC 2/3 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 0/2 times in the past 12 years.  

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.   IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”.   This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 12 years (1999-2010); however, the multiple samples were not collected during a five-year period.   According to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report).   IDNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/26/2008 Biological Monitoring
9/7/2000 Biological Monitoring
9/7/2000 One-time Chemical Monitoring
1/1/1999 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 2
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Not Impairing