East Branch Iowa River IA 02-IOW-769
mouth (S19T93N R23W Wright Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in S16 T94N R23W Hancock Co. north of Goodell State Wildlife Management Area.
- Cycle
- 2018
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 5/14/2019 8:17:28 AM
- Updated
- 8/2/2019 9:52:28 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” due to violations of Iowa water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. The source of data for this assessment remains the results of monitoring at one site (EBIR8; STORET station 13410012) conducted as part of a Clean Water Act Section 319 water quality project from June 2009 through October 2010. The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2010 and 2012.
The presumptive Class A1 uses remain assessed (evaluated) as “not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceed the Class A1 geometric mean criterion. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 19 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2009 and 2010 at the Section 319 monitoring station EBIR8 were 436 and 432 orgs/100 ml, respectively. Both of these recreation season geometric means exceed Iowa’s Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 E. coli orgs/100 ml, thus indicating nonsupport of the Class A1 primary contact recreation uses. Eleven of the 19 samples (58%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean is greater than the respective criterion (126 orgs/100 ml for Class A1, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “partially supported” based on biological data collected in 2010 and 2012 as part of the DNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2010 FIBI score was 57 (good) and the BMIBI score was 74 (good). The 2012 FIBI scores were 35 and 43 (both fair) and the BMIBI scores were 50 and 51 (both fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 32 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 62. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 3/3 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 1/3 times in the last seven years.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 DNR assessment methodology. DNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a recent five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous seven years (2010-2016).