Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Raven Creek IA 02-IOW-723

mouth (S25 T83NR16W Tama Co.) to W line of S35 T83N R16W Tama Co.

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
8/2/2019 10:28:27 AM
Updated
8/2/2019 10:29:54 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5p - Impairment occurs on a waterbody with a presumptive A1 or B(WW1) use.
Cause Magnitude
High
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2010
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Special project/study
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW2
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 2
Fully Supported
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed as “not supported” due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli that exceed state water quality criteria.  The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remain assessed as "fully supported” based on results of chemical/physical monitoring in 2006.  The source of data for this assessment remains the results of USGS ambient water quality monitoring conducted on Raven Creek near Montour (station 05451762) from April through December 2006.  USGS issued a report in 2009 summarizing water quality for this stream and other streams sampled in 2006 on the Meskwaki Indian Reservation (see http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5105/). 

Assessment Explanation

The presumptive Class A1 uses remain assessed (monitored) as "not supported" based on results of USGS ambient monitoring near Montour in 2006. The geometric mean level of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the six samples collected (3,134 orgs/100ml) far exceeds the Iowa Class A1 water quality criterion of 126 orgs/100ml. All six samples exceeded Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and according to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean level of E. coli is greater than the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b).

Because the data upon which this assessment is based are now older than five years, this assessment is considered of lower confidence (“evaluated). As data age beyond five years, their ability to accurately characterize current water quality conditions is increasingly suspect. In addition, the number of samples collected at this station (six) is relatively low and does not meet DNR guidelines for developing a “monitored” (higher confidence) assessment (i.e., at least 10 samples collected over a three-year period). Despite the relatively low number of samples, the relatively high geometric mean of indicator bacteria in this stream segment (3,134 orgs/100 ml) constitutes overwhelming evidence of impairment of the presumptive Class A1 uses. According to Iowa’s listing methodology, overwhelming evidence of bacterial impairment occurs when the E. coli geometric mean of at least five samples collected at regular intervals over a summer recreational season that meets credible data requirements would exceed Iowa’s geometric mean criterion even if the remainder of the 10 samples needed for a high-confidence (“monitored”) assessment all had E. coli levels equal to the DNR’s detection level for E. coli (i.e., 10 orgs/100 ml). If four samples all with E. coli levels of 10 orgs/100 ml are added to the Raven Creek dataset for 2006, the resulting geometric mean (315 orgs/100 ml) still exceeds the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml and thus suggests impairment of the presumptive Class A1 use.

Results of the USGS ambient water quality monitoring from April through December 2006 showed no violations of Class B(WW2) water quality criteria in the approximately six samples analyzed for dissolved oxygen, pH, and ammonia. In addition, none of the approximately seven samples analyzed for toxic metals and pesticides exceeded the respective Class B(WW2) chronic criteria. Thus, the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses were assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting”.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
4/24/2006
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/4/2006
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
240
Non-fixed station physical/chemical (conventional + toxicants)
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring