Richland Creek IA 02-IOW-718
mouth (S13 T82NR14W Tama Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in NE 1/4 SE 1/4 S20 T82N R14W Tama Co.
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 9/1/2016 4:45:15 PM
- Updated
- 9/16/2016 7:46:33 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" (IR 3a) due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(WW-2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" (IR 2a) based on results of IDNR/SHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 1999 and 2010. Note: USGS conducted monitoring in this assessment segment at station 05451900 near Haven, IA, in September 2009. Too few data were produced from this monitoring during the 2008-2010 assessment period (one sample) to be of use for assessment for purposes of either Section 305(b) reporting or Section 303(d) listing. No water quality monitoring was conducted at USGS station 05451900 during the 2012-2014 monitoring period.
[Note: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008, this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses. The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses). Thus, for the current assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]
The assessment of the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses remains based on data collected in 1999 and 2010 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. The 1999 FIBI score was 55 (good) and the BMIBI score was 61 (good). The 2010 FIBI score was 41 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 63 (good). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 51. This segment passed the FIBI and BMIBI BICs 2/2 times in the last 16 years.
This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a recent five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 16 years (1999-2014); however, the multiple samples were not collected during a five-year period. Despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 2a.