Kent Park Lake IA 02-IOW-694
Johnson County S24T80NR8W 2.5 mi. W of Tiffin.
- Cycle
- 2022
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 4 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL has been completed or is not needed.
- Trophic
- Eutrophic
- Trend
- Stable
- Created
- 12/21/2021 3:10:56 PM
- Updated
- 2/17/2022 9:53:56 AM
| Cycle Added | Class | Cause | Data Source | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Class A1 | Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli | Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes | New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial) |
The Class A1 use was assessed as “not supported” due to high levels of algae that violated Iowa's narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions. The level of inorganic suspended solids was low at Kent Park Lake and does not suggest water quality problems due to non-algal turbidity. The Class BLW use was assessed (evaluated) as “WINOFI” due to cyanobacteria blooms. The Class HH (fish consumption) use was assessed as "fully supported" based on fish tissue sampling data. Note: A TMDL for the algae and pH impairments at Kent Park Lake was prepared by Iowa DNR and was approved by U.S.EPA in June 2015.
Data
Sources: Data Source Data Source ID Data Type Data Age Site ID Site
Name Site
Description Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2019-2020 21520002 F.
W. Kent Park Beach Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2016-2020 22520005 Kent
Park Lake Iowa DNR 6 FT See Below 306 Kent
Park Lake Kent
Park NW of Tiffin Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020) 2018 Geometric Mean 2019 Geometric Mean 2020 Geometric Mean Violates Annual Geometric Mean? # 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment # 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment # 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 21520002 6 0/5/12 NA 6 11 NO NA 0 / NA 1 / 4 NO Monitored Full Kent Park Lake was assessed as "not supported" for
the 2014 assessment/listing cycle. Based on DNR’s assessment methodology 2
consecutive assessment/listing cycles without violations of the geometric mean
criterion and without significantly greater than 10% of the samples violating
the single-sample maximum criterion are necessary to propose delisting based on
bacteria violations. There were no violations of the geometric mean criterion
and there were less than 10% of the samples exceeding the single-sample maximum
criterion for the 2020 or current 2022 assessment listing cycle.
Therefore, the impairment for indicator bacteria is suggested for delisting for
the 2022 assessment/listing cycle. Class A1 - pH: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 22520005 6 9 / 3 7.9 8.7 8.3 0 3 NO Evaluated Full Class A1 - Lake TSI's Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Median Value Median TSI Violation? Assessment Type Support Level 22520005 6 Chlorophyll a TSI 9 / 3 26 75 57 NO Monitored Full 22520005 6 Secchi TSI 9 / 3 46 77 59 NO Monitored Full 22520005 6 Total Phosphorus TSI 9 / 3 35 79 56 NA NA NA 22520005 6 Inorganic suspended solids 9 / 3 0.6 7 1.6 NA NA NA Although the index value for Chlorophyll a is below the
impairment trigger of 65 for this assessment cycle, the Class A1 use of Kent Park Lake remains listed
as "not supported" due to aesthetically objectionable
conditions. Based on DNR's methodology, the median TSI value for Chlorophyll a
must be 63 or less for two consecutive assessment/listing cycles before a lake can be removed from the state's Section 303(d) list (IR Category 5). Therefore,
Kent Park Lake will remain listed as "not supported" (4a) for
the 2022 assessment/listing cycle. Class BLW - Conventional Parameters: Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations # Acute / Chronic Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 22520005 6 Ammonia 9 / 3 0.0003 0.283 0.04 NA 0 / 0 3 NO Evaluated Full 22520005 6 Dissolved Oxygen 9 / 3 4.5 15.1 9.5 1 NA / NA 3 NO Evaluated Full 22520005 6 pH 9 / 3 7.9 8.7 8.3 0 NA / NA 3 NO Evaluated Full 22520005 6 Temperature 9 / 3 19.1 28.3 24.7 0 NA / NA 3 NO Evaluated Full Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass Median Cyanobacteria % Composition Median Cyanobacteria Concentration = 75th Percentile Assessment Type Support Level 22520005 6 4 25.45 95.7% 17.37 86.1% YES Evaluated 3b Class HH - Fish
Tissue Sampling: Site ID Biopart Year Species # in sample / # of samples Avg Length (cm) (Avg) Hg (ppm) Chlordane (ppm) Sum PCBs (ppm) 306 fillet 2013 channel catfish 3 47.8 0.05 <0.2 <0.6 306 tissue plug 2013 largemouth bass 5 31.7 0.107
Support Level Full