Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Kent Park Lake IA 02-IOW-694

Johnson County S24T80NR8W 2.5 mi. W of Tiffin.

Assessment Cycle
2010
Result Period
2006 - 2008
Designations
Class B(LW) Class A1 Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5a
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-IOW-01630-L_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2004 through 2007 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted from 2005 through 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), and (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY: The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to high levels of algae that violate Iowa's narrative criteria protecting against aesthetically objectionable conditions.   Violations of Iowa’s water quality criterion for pH also contribute to this impairment.   The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to violations of Iowa’s water quality criterion for pH.   Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to a lack of fish contaminant monitoring at this lake.   Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of the statewide survey of Iowa lakes conducted from 2004 through 2007 by Iowa State University (ISU), (2) results of the statewide ambient lake monitoring program conducted from 2005 through 2008 by University Hygienic Laboratory (UHL), and (3) information from the IDNR Fisheries Bureau.

EXPLANATION: For the 2010 reporting cycle, the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses for Kent Park Lake are assessed (monitored) as “partially supported” due to high levels of algae and violations of the state’s water quality criteria for pH.   Using the median values from the ISU and UHL lake surveys from 2004 through 2008 (approximately 25 samples), Carlson’s (1977) trophic state indices for Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus were 62, 65, and 65 respectively for Kent Park Lake.   According to Carlson (1977) the Secchi depth, chlorophyll a, and total phosphorus values all place Kent Park Lake in between the eutrophic and the hypereutrophic categories.   These values suggest high levels of chlorophyll a and suspended algae in the water, moderately poor water transparency, and high levels of phosphorus in the water column.  

The levels of inorganic suspended solids at this lake were moderately high and do not suggest that non-algal turbidity contributes to the impairment at this lake.   The median level of inorganic suspended solids in Kent Park Lake (4.0 mg/L) was the 66th lowest median of the 132 lakes sampled by the ISU and UHL programs.

Data from the 2004-2008 ISU and UHL surveys suggest a moderate population of cyanobacteria exists at Kent Park Lake, which does not contribute to impairment at this lake.   These data show that cyanobacteria comprised 74% of the phytoplankton wet mass at this lake.   The median cyanobacteria wet mass (17.8 mg/L) was the 53rd highest of the 132 lakes sampled.  

The Class B(LW) (aquatic life) uses are assessed as “partially supported” based on information from IDNR’s Fisheries Bureau and results from the ISU and UHL lake surveys.   The ISU and UHL lake surveys data from 2004-2008 show no violations of the Class B(LW) criteria for ammonia in 23 samples, or dissolved oxygen in 25 samples.   The pH data, however, show 5 violations of the Class A1,B(LW) criterion for pH in 25 samples (20%).   Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology these violations are significantly greater than 10% of the samples and therefore the Class B(LW) uses are assessed as “partially supporting.”  These violations likely reflect primary productivity at Kent Park Lake and do not reflect the input of pollutants into this lake.  

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this lake.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/29/2008 Fixed Monitoring End Date
6/10/2004 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
222 Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340 Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
pH Primary Contact Recreation Slight
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Slight
pH Aquatic Life Support Slight
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Slight
Algal Grwth/Chlorophyll a Primary Contact Recreation Moderate
  • Internal nutrient cycling (primarily lakes)
  • Moderate