Willow Creek IA 02-CED-6593
from mouth (T99N R18W Sec26) to headwaters (T99N R18W Sec19) Mitchell Co.
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 8/12/2016 10:40:55 AM
- Updated
- 9/29/2016 9:07:38 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported” (IR 5p) due to violations of Iowa water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed as “fully supporting (IR 2a) based on results of chemical/physical monitoring. The source of data for this assessment is the results of monitoring at STORET station 15660005 (Willow Creek at Echo Ave.) conducted as part of a Clean Water Act Section 319 water quality project from May 2012 through November 2013.
The presumptive Class A1 uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported" (IR 5p) due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceed the Class A1 geometric mean criterion. The geometric mean of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 13 samples collected at station 15660005 during the recreation seasons of 2012 and 2013 were as follows: the geometric mean during the 2012 recreation season was 409 orgs/100 ml, and the geometric mean during the 2013 recreation season was 112 orgs/100 ml. The 2012 geometric mean exceeds the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Five of the 13 samples (38%) exceeded the Class A1 single sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean is greater than the respective criterion (126 orgs/100 ml for Class A1, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, the Class A1 uses are assessed as impaired (“partially supporting”). In addition, the percentage of samples with levels of E. coli that exceeded Iowa single-sample maximum criteria is significantly greater than 10% and thus also indicates impairment of presumptive Class A1 uses at this monitoring site.
Results of chemical/physical monitoring at station 15660005 during the 2012-2013 period suggest "full support" of the presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. None of the 15 samples analyzed violated the Class B(WW1) criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, or ammonia, and none of the seven samples analyzed for chloride violated the respective Class B(WW1) criteria. One of the 15 samples (7%) violated the Class B(WW1) criterion for temperature of 32C. According to U.S. EPA guidelines (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), a violation frequency of greater than 10% for conventional parameters such as pH and dissolved oxygen suggests impairment of aquatic life uses. Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology, however, these results suggest that the frequency of violations is not significantly greater than 10 percent; thus, these results do not suggest impairment of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.