Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Elm Lake IA 02-IOW-657

Wright County S21T92NR24W 1 mi. S of Cornelia.

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-IOW-00870-L_0
Overall Use Support
Threatened
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on information from the IDNR Wildlife Bureau and on watershed modeling by the IDNR Water Quality Bureau.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supporting / threatened" due to siltation.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed."  

EXPLANATION:  The aquatic life uses are assessed as "fully supporting / threatened."  The upgrade in support of the aquatic life uses from "partially supporting" (see assessments for the 1998 and 2000 reports above) to "fully supported / threatened" is based on the following information from the Iowa DNR Water Quality Bureau.   Watershed modeling on this wetland indicates that sediment delivery to the wetland is estimated at 1.6 tons/2" rainfall event from the entire watershed.   This is a very low sediment delivery rate and would be difficult to reduce further.   Based on this information, the previous identification of "siltation" as impairing the aquatic life uses of this wetland was probably in error.   Thus, the level of support of the aquatic life uses is upgraded from "partially supported" to "fully supporting / threatened."  The assessment category for this wetland is "evaluated."  In terms of Section 305(b) reporting, "monitored assessments" are based primarily on recent, site-specific ambient monitoring data and thus have relatively high confidence.   "Evaluated assessments" are those based on data older than five years or other than site-specific ambient monitoring data (e.g., desktop models or questionnaire surveys of fish and game biologists [=best professional judgement]) and thus have relatively lower confidence.  

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring.   In general, Iowa wetlands are not managed for recreational fisheries; thus, fish contaminant monitoring is not typically conducted at these waterbodies.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
180 Screening models (desktop models/models not calibrated or verified)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Natural Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing