Unnamed Tributary to Silver Creek IA 01-UIA-6569
from mouth (T99N R11W Sec13) to headwaters (T99N R11W Sec23) Howard Co.
- Cycle
- 2018
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 7/19/2019 9:24:05 AM
- Updated
- 7/19/2019 9:25:50 AM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to violations of Iowa water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed as “fully supporting: based on results of chemical/physical monitoring. The source of data for this assessment remains the results of monitoring at STORET stations 15450017 (Trib to Silver Creek DS of WWTP) and STORET station 15450018 (Trib to Silver Creek US of WWTP) conducted as part of a Clean Water Act Section 319 water quality project from April 2011 through July 2012.
The presumptive Class A1 uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceed the Class A1 geometric mean criterion. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 22 samples collected at Site 2 during the recreation seasons of 2011 and 2012 were as follows: the 2011 geometric mean was 272 orgs/100 ml and the 2012 geometric mean was 2,186 orgs/100 ml. Fifteen of the 22 samples (68%) exceeded the Class A1 single sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. Similarly, the geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 22 samples collected at Site 1 during the recreation seasons of 2011 and 2012 were as follows: the 2011 geometric mean was 315 orgs/100 ml and the 2012 geometric mean was 557 orgs/100 ml. Sixteen of the 22 samples (73%) exceeded the Class A1 single sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean is greater than the respective criterion (126 orgs/100 ml for Class A1, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). In addition, the percentage of samples with levels of E. coli that exceeded Iowa single-sample maximum criteria indicates impairment of presumptive Class A1 uses at this monitoring site.
Results of chemical/physical monitoring at Sites 1 and 2 during the 2011-12 period suggest "full support" of the presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. None of the approximately 15 samples analyzed from May to November 2011 at Sites 1 and 2 violated the Class B(WW1) criteria for ammonia, dissolved oxygen, pH, or temperature. Based on DNR’s assessment methodology, these results suggest that the presumptive Class B(WW1) uses should be assessed as "fully supporting."