Dry Run Creek IA 01-UIA-6552
from west line of section (T98N R9W Sec36) to headwaters (T98N R9W Sec29) Winneshiek Co.
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported” (IR 5p) due to violations of Iowa water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supporting" (IR 2a) based on results of chemical/physical monitoring in 2010 and 2011. The source of data for this assessment remains the results of monitoring at two stations monitored as part of an IDNR water quality project: (1) STORET station 15960026 (Dry Run Watershed Site 14) from April 2010 through October 2011 and (2) STORET station 15960027 (Dry Run Watershed Site 15) from April to November 2010.
The presumptive Class A1 uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported" (IR 5p) due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that exceed the Class A1 geometric mean criterion. The geometric mean of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 13 samples collected at Station 15960026 (Site 14) during the recreation season of 2010 was 1,708 orgs/100 ml, and the geometric mean of the 15 samples collected during the recreation season of 2011 was 1,985 orgs/100 ml. Twenty-five of the 28 samples (89%) exceeded the Class A1 single sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. Similarly, the geometric mean of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 13 samples collected at Station 15960027 (Site 15) during the recreation season of 2010 was 1,279 orgs/100 ml. Eleven of the 13 samples (85%) exceeded the Class A1 single sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if a recreation season geometric mean is greater than the respective criterion (126 orgs/100 ml for Class A1, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). In addition, the percentage of samples with levels of E. coli that exceeded Iowa single-sample maximum criteria indicates impairment of presumptive Class A1 uses at this monitoring site. Note: The monitoring conducted as part of this watershed study included sampling for indicator bacteria (E. coli) immediately (within 24 hours) following rainfall runoff events. About half the samples in each of 2010 and 2011 were collected under such conditions. See the following journal article for more information: Witttman et al. 2013. Evaluation of land use and water quality in an agricultural watershed in the USA indicates multiple sources of bacterial impairment. Environ. Monit. Assess (2013) 185:10395-10429.
Results of chemical/physical monitoring at Sites 14 and 15 during the 2010-12 period suggest "full support" of the presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. At site 14, none of the 26 samples analyzed from May to September 2011 violated the Class B(WW1) criteria for ammonia. One of 32 samples (3%) violated the Class B(WW1) criterion for dissolved oxygen of 5 mg/l, and one of 27 samples violated the Class B(WW1) criterion for pH of 6.5 units. According to U.S. EPA guidelines (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), a violation frequency of greater than 10% for conventional parameters such as pH and dissolved oxygen suggests impairment of aquatic life uses. Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology, however, these results suggest that the frequency of violations is not significantly greater than 10 percent; thus, these results do not suggest impairment of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses. Similarly at Site 15, none of the approximately 12 samples analyzed from April to November 2010 for ammonia, pH, or temperature violated the respective Class B(WW1) criteria. One of 13 samples analyzed for dissolved oxygen violated the Class B(WW1) criterion of 5 mg/l. Because these results suggest that the frequency of violations is not significantly greater than 10 percent; these results do not suggest impairment of the presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.