Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Iowa River IA 02-IOW-647

from confluence with Pine Cr. (S8 T87N R19W Hardin Co.) to bridge crossing in SE 1/4 S12 T88N R20W Hardin Co.

Assessment Cycle
2008
Result Period
2004 - 2006
Designations
HQR Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-IOW-0070_4
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on 2005 REMAP data: FIBI = 63 (good), 71 (excellent); BMIBI = 68 (good), 71 (good).

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY/EXPLANATION:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.

The evaluated biological assessment of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2005 as part of the DNR/UHL stream REMAP project.   A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2005 FIBI scores were 63 (good), 71 (excellent) and the BMIBI scores were 68 (good), 71 (good).   The FIBI average was 67 and the BMIBI average was 69.5.   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   This site segment passed all of the FIBI and BMIBI BICs from both the 47b and 47f ecoregions.   This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage area (748 mi2) above this sampling site was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria.   Even though this site passed both the FIBI and BMIBI BICs, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
10/11/2005 Biological Monitoring
8/6/2005 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Very Good