Town Branch IA 04-LDM-6418
from mouth (T69N R10W Sec34) to headwaters (T69N R10W Sec31 SE)
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 9/1/2016 1:54:59 PM
- Updated
- 10/11/2016 12:55:28 PM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment (IR Category 3a). The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting” based on IDNR/SHL biological sampling conducted in 2014 and 2015 (IR Category 2a).
This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 2014 and 2015 as part of the IDNR/SHL headwater stream sampling project. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2014 and 2015 FIBI scores were 2 (poor), 36 (fair) and 54, 58 (both good). The 2014 and 2015 BMIBI scores were 41, 47, 47 and 49 (all fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 33 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 41. Even though this site passed both the FIBI (3/4) and BMIBI BICs (4/4), it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small presumed BWW1 (formally general use) stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.