Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Worle Creek IA 03-SSK-6286

Alternate name(s) for this segment: Worrell Creek

from mouth (T83N R24W Sec10 Story Co.) to headwaters (T83N R25W Sec5 Boone Co.)

Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
3 - Insufficient data exist to determine whether any designated uses are met.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/3/2019 12:59:45 PM
Updated
7/23/2019 8:08:55 AM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life - Warm Water Type 1
WINOFI
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2010
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
General Use
General Use water -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.    The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on results of DNR/SHL biological sampling in 2007.

Assessment Explanation

The assessment of the presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are based on data collected in 2007 as part of the DNR/SHL headwater stream sampling project. A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2007 FIBI score was 19 (poor) and the BMIBI score was 63 (good). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The riffle-habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 53 and the BMIBI BIC is 62.Even though this site failed the FIBI BIC and passed the BMIBI BIC, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small headwater stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size. Also, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence).

This assessment is considered “evaluated” (of lower confidence) due to the lack of a biological assessment protocol for general use-only streams. DNR’s existing protocol has been calibrated to aquatic life reference conditions in wadeable Class B(LR) and Class B(WW) streams.The aquatic environment of most general use streams is one of extremes in water quality.Consequently, general use-only streams tend to have biological diversity that is low relative to more stable aquatic environments of Class B(LR) and Class B(WW) streams.Thus, the use of biological assessment methods developed for the ecologically more stable and diverse Class B(LR) streams to assess general use reaches will likely overstate the existence of impairment.For these reasons, general use-only stream reaches that show a failure to meet regional expectations for aquatic biota (fish or aquatic macroinvertebrates) of Class B(LR) streams, will not be added to Iowa’s Section 303(d) list of impaired waters (Category 5 of the Integrated Report).The assessment type for these waters will be considered "evaluated" (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to “monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively high confidence).Such waters will be placed in either Category 2b or 3b of the IR and thus will be added to the state’s list of “waters in need of further investigation”.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
7/25/2007
Biological Monitoring
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330
Fish surveys
380
Quantitative physical habitat assessment