Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Mississippi River IA 01-NEM-61

from Iowa R. (Louisa Co.) to Lock & Dam 15 at Davenport Scott Co.

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-NEM-0010_1
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Not assessed
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on fish tissue monitoring (RAFT) at two locations in the Upper Mississippi River: (1) near Muscatine in 1999, 2001, and 2002 and (2) near Buffalo (Scott Co.) in 1998, 2000, and 2002.

Basis for Assessment

The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses and the Class B(WW) aquatic life uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   Fish consumption uses remain assessed as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring from 1998 through 2002.   The data used for this assessment are from results of the U.S.  EPA/DNR (RAFT) fish tissue monitoring program near Buffalo, Iowa, in 1998, 2000, and 2002 (trend (whole-fish) monitoring) and near Muscatine in 1999, 2001 and 2002 (status (fillet) monitoring).   Note:  the RAFT trend monitoring site near Linwood was moved downriver to Buffalo in 1998.  

EXPLANATION:  The Class A (primary contact recreation) uses and the Class B(WW) aquatic life uses remain "not assessed" due to lack of monitoring information for this river reach.   Results of EPA/DNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring on the Mississippi River near Buffalo 1998, 2000, and 2002 showed that levels of all contaminants in the three samples of whole-fish carp were below the respective FDA action levels.   For details regarding the 1998 and 2000 samples, see the assessment developed for the 2002 report.   The composite sample of whole-fish common carp collected from this site as part of RAFT trend monitoring in 2002 had very low levels of contaminants.   This sample did not contain levels of contaminants that approached even one-half the respective action levels or IDNR levels of concern.   Levels of primary contaminants in the sample were as follows: mercury: 0.133 ppm; total PCBs: 0.295 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.069 ppm..   In addition to this trend (whole-fish) sampling, EPA/DNR (RAFT) status (fillet) monitoring conducted downstream from Muscatine in 1999, 2001 and 2002 showed that levels of all contaminants in composite samples of fillets are well-below ½ of the respective FDA action levels and DNR levels of concern (see also assessment for the 2000 and 2002 reports).   Composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and flathead catfish collected in 2002 had very low levels of contaminants.   Neither sample contained levels of contaminants that approached even one-half the respective FDA action levels or IDNR levels of concern.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.055 ppm; total PCBs: 0.123 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of flathead catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.044 ppm; total PCBs: <0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: <0.03 ppm.   Based on this information, fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported."

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/30/2002 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/18/2001 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/21/2000 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/17/1999 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/24/1998 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
260 Fish tissue analysis
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A