Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Deer Creek IA 02-CED-592

from Mitchell-Worth county line (west line S6 T100N R18W Mitchell Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary at E line of S28 T100N R19W Worth Co.

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
Class B(LR)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 3b
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0540_2
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment remains based on results of an IDNR investigation of a fish kill in April 2000.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supported" based on a report of a fish kill in April 2000.   Due to the absence of kills subsequent to that kill, this assessment segment will be considered “evaluated” and thus moved from Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required) to Category 3b (water in need of further investigation) of Iowa's 2006 Integrated Report.    

EXPLANATION:  A fish kill occurred on this stream segment on April 6, 2000.   The kill affected 6.5 miles of Deer Creek beginning at the Iowa/Minnesota state line and extending downstream at the west line, S35, T100N, R19W, Worth County; an estimated 59,000 fish were killed.   The kill was caused by a fertilzer spill at an ag-chemical dealer in Myrtle, MN.  

According to DNR's assessment methodology for Section 305(b) reporting, occurrence of a single pollution-caused fish kill during an assessment period indicates "partial support" of the aquatic life uses.   If, however, a consent order has been issued to the party responsible for the kill and monetary restitution has been sought for the fish killed, the affected waterbody should be placed in IR Category 4d (impaired but TMDL not required).   Thus, this assessment segment was placed into Category 4d of Iowa's 2004 Integrated Report.   Also, according to IDNR's assessment/listing methodology, if no additional fish kills have occurred over at least a three-year period (i.e., no kills occurred in the period 2002-2004), the assessment of impairment should be considered “evaluated” (i.e., of lower confidence), and the waterbody segment should be moved from IR Category 4d to IR Category 3b (list of waters in need of further investigation).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
4/6/2000 Fishkill
Methods
140 Incidence of spills and/or fish kills
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Unionized Ammonia Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Spills
  • Not Impairing