Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Deer Creek IA 02-CED-591

mouth (S23 T99N R18W Mitchell Co.) to the Mitchell-Worth county line (west line S6 T100N R18W Mitchell Co.)

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 1
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0540_1
Overall Use Support
Threatened
Aquatic Life Use Support
Threatened
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on results of (1) IDNR/UHL biocriteria sampling in 2001 and (2) statewide survey of freshwater mussels in 1998-99 (Arbuckle et al. 2000).

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  For the 2002 report, the previous waterbody segment IA 02-CED-0540-0, which extended 12  miles from the mouth of Deer Creek to an unnamed tributary in Worth County, was split into two subsegments:  (1) mouth to the Mitchell-Worth county line.  (IA 02-CED-0540-1) and (2) Mitchell-Worth county line to confluence with an unnamed tributary at east line of S28, T100N, R19W, Worth Co.  (IA 02-CED-0540-2).   See assessment information above for previous Section 305(b) assessments for the previous 12-mile stream segment.]

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported / threatened" based on results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring in 2001.   Results from the 1998-99 statewide survey of freshwater mussels suggests "full support" of aquatic life uses.

EXPLANATION:  The assessment was based on data collected in 2001 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.  The 2001 Fish IBI score was 68 (good) and the BM-IBI score was 77 (excellent).  The aquatic life use support was assessed as fully supporting/threatened (=FST), based on a comparison of the F-IBI and BM-IBI scores with biological assessment criteria established specifically for the 2002 Section 305(b) report.  The biological assessment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2001.

This segment of Deer Crek was sampled as part of the 1998-99 statewide study of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams and rivers (Arbuckle et al.  2000).   As part of this study, sampling results from 1998 and 1999 (Arbuckle et al.  2000) were compared to results from stream sites surveyed in 1984 and 1985 by Frest (1987).   On a statewide basis, this comparison showed sharp declines in the numbers of mussel species ("species richness") in Iowa streams and rivers from the mid-1980s to the late 1990s.   For stream segments having four or more species reported for the 1984-95 survey, results of this comparison were used by staff of the Iowa DNR Water Quality Bureau to assess the degree to which the aquatic life uses of the sampled stream segments are supported.   The results of this sampling on Deer Creek, however, showed an increase in species richness between the 1984-98 and 1998-99 survey peirods.   Species richness of freshwater mussels at the one sample site in this segment was 7 in the 1984-85 period and was 12 in the 1998-99 period, respectively, for a percent change of plus 71%.   These results suggest "full support" of the aquatic life uses.   The assessment of the aquatic life uses, however, will remain based on the results of the more traditional biological monitoring conducted in this segment in 2001 (i.e., multi-metric fish / benthic macroinvertebrate indexes of biotic integrity).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/22/2001 Biological Monitoring
12/1/2000 Biological Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Good
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Other habitat alterations Overall Use Support Not Impairing
  • Channelization
  • Hydromodification
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing