Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Fenchel Creek (a.k.a. Richmond Springs) IA 01-MAQ-59

mouth (S5 T90N R6W Delaware Co.) to Richmond Springs in center S4 T90N R6W Delaware Co.

Assessment Cycle
2012
Result Period
2008 - 2010
Designations
Class A1 Class A2 Class B(CW1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-MAQ-0280_0
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Secondary Contact Recration
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on 2007 IDNR/SHL biological monitoring (CBI = 65; CW BIC = 60) and on a 2011 summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(CW) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, this segment is also now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for coldwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(CW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption) uses.  

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and the presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of data for indicator bacteria upon which to base an assessment.   The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on the February 2011 summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams as prepared by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau and the 2007 IDNR/SHL biological monitoring data.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed".  

EXPLANATION:  The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was based on data collected in 2007 as part of the IDNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling project.   A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI).   The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2007 CBI score was 65.  The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the CBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011.  The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 1/1 times in 2007.  

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.   IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”.   This segment had a single sample collected in 2007.   Despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody was placed in IR Category 2a.  

In addition, based on a summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams prepared by the DNR Fisheries Bureau in February 2011, the Class B(CW1) uses are assessed as "fully supported".   According to the updated summary, Richmond Springs is in the group of Iowa coldwater streams that supports natural reproduction of trout.   Based on results of surveys by the IDNR Fisheries Bureau, this stream is placed in the category of Iowa trout streams that have fairly consistent natural reproduction and that are capable of maintaining a viable population for the target trout species without any stocking.   This assessment is consistent with previous assessments of the ability of this stream to support natural reproduction of trout.  

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to lack of fish tissue monitoring in this stream reach.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
2/1/2011 Biological Monitoring
9/17/2007 Biological Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
315 Regional reference site approach
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 2
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity N/A