Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Little Cedar River IA 02-CED-578

from confluence with Burr Oak Cr. (S12 T98N R16W Mitchell Co.) to dam of impoundment at Stacyville in SE 1/4 S31 T100N R16W Mitchell Co.

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Not Assessed
Integrated Report
Category 3a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0480_1
Overall Use Support
Not assessed
Aquatic Life Use Support
Not assessed
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Previous assessments were based on 1999 Fisheries data: FIBI = 76 (excellent). Riffle site FIBI BIC = 65. Due to the age of these data (> 10 years), the aquatic life uses are now considered "not assessed".

Basis for Assessment

Previous assessments were based on 1999 IDNR Fisheries sampling data:  FIBI = 76 (excellent),  riffle habitat FIBI BIC = 65.   Due to the age of these data (> 10 years), the aquatic life uses are now considered "not assessed".

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(WW) aquatic life uses, including fish consumption uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, and due to the completion of a Use Attainability Analysis, this segment is also now designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   This segment remains designated for warmwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(WW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption uses).]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and fish consumption (Class HH) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The degree to which the Class B(WW-1) aquatic life uses are supported is being changed from “fully supported” (evaluated) as assessed for the 2012 Integrated Reporting cycle to “not assessed” for the current (2014) cycle.   This change is being made because the data upon which previous assessments were based have now aged beyond ten years.   As water quality data age, they are less able to represent current water quality conditions.   As data age beyond ten years, their ability to represent current water quality conditions is increasing suspect.   Additional monitoring is needed in this assessment segment to update status of its aquatic communities.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
1/1/1999 Biological Monitoring
Methods
315 Regional reference site approach
330 Fish surveys
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 3
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 0
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Excellent