South Beaver Creek IA 02-CED-561
mouth (S25 T90N R17W Butler Co.) to confluence with Middle Fork South Beaver Cr. in S28T89R17W Grundy Co.
- Cycle
- 2016
- Release Status
- Final
- Overall IR
- 2 - Some of the designated uses are met but there is insufficient data to determine if remaining designated uses are met.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 9/15/2016 2:29:27 PM
- Updated
- 12/1/2016 3:28:34 PM
The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" (IR 3a) due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment. The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" (IR 2a) based on results of IDNR/SHL biological sampling in 1996, 2001, 2008 and 2014.
The Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as “fully supporting” based on data collected in 1996, 2001, 2008 and 2014 as part of the IDNR/SHL stream biocriteria project. The 1996 FIBI score was 51 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 66 (good). The 2001 FIBI score was 44 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 74 (good). The 2008 FIBI score was 50 (fair) and the BMIBI score was unavailable. The 2014 FIBI score was 63 (good) and the BMIBI score was 41 (fair). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 44 and the artificial substrate BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 52. This segment passed the FIBI BIC 4/4 times and passed the BMIBI BIC 2/3 times in the past 19 years. This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology. IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”. This segment had multiple samples collected in the previous 19 years (1996-2014); however, the multiple samples were not collected during a five-year period. Despite this change in assessment methodology and type, this waterbody remains in IR Category 2a.