Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Black Hawk Creek IA 02-CED-545

mouth (S22 T89N R13W Black Hawk Co.) to Hwy 58 in E 1/2 S27 T88N R14W Black Hawk Co.)

Assessment Cycle
2008
Result Period
2004 - 2006
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-1) Class HH
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 4a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0370_1
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Fish Consumption
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on: (1) results monthly monitoring from January 2004 through December 2006 at the IDNR ambient station at Ridgeway Avenue SW of Waterloo (station 10070004), (2) results of IDNR/UHL TMDL-related monitoring conducted in 2005 at Waterloo (station 11700005), and (3) U.S. EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring in 2004 near Hudson.

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "not supported" due to continued high levels of indicator bacteria that violate state water quality standards.   The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of ambient water quality monitoring.   Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2004.   Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results monthly monitoring from January 2004 through December 2006 at the IDNR ambient station at Ridgeway Avenue SW of Waterloo (station 10070004), (2) results of IDNR/UHL TMDL-related monitoring conducted in 2005 at Waterloo (station 11700005), and (3) U.S.  EPA/IDNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring in 2004 near Hudson.  

Note:  A TMDL for indicator bacteria in this segment of Black Hawk Creek was prepared by IDNR and approved by EPA in 2006.   Because all Section 303(d) impairments identified for the 2008 assessment/listing cycle (indicator bacteria) are addressed by the TMDL, this waterbody is placed in IR Category 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).

EXPLANATION:  The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses were assessed as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E.  coli) that violated Iowa’s Class A water quality criteria during recreational seasons of 2004, 2005 and 2006.   Due to recent changes in Iowa’s Water Quality Standards, Iowa’s assessment methodology for indicator bacteria has changed.   Prior to 2003, the Iowa WQ Standards contained a high-flow exemption for the Class A criterion for indicator bacteria (fecal coliforms) designed to protect primary contact recreation uses:  the water quality criterion for fecal coliform bacteria (200 orgs/100 ml) did not apply "when the waters [were] materially affected by surface runoff."  Due to a change in the Standards in July 2003, E.  coli is now the indicator bacterium, and the high flow exemption was eliminated and replaced with language stating that the Class A criteria for E.  coli apply when Class A1, A2, or A3 uses “can reasonably be expected to occur.”  Because the IDNR Technical Advisory Committee on WQ Standards could not agree on what flow conditions would define periods when uses would not be reasonably expected to occur, all monitoring data generated for E.  coli during the assessment period, regardless of flow conditions during sample collection, will be considered for determining support of Class A uses for purposes of Section 305(b) assessments and Section 303(d) listings.  

The geometric mean of E.  coli bacteria in the 75 samples collected at the IDNR/UHL ambient monitoring station (10700004) from 2004-2006 was 402 orgs/100 ml; this geometric mean exceeds Iowa’s Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml.   Fifty-two samples (69%) exceeded Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.   According to U.S.  EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and according to IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean level of E.  coli is greater than the state criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses are "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S.  EPA 1997b).   Results at IDNR/UHL TMDL station 11700005 are similar and also suggest nonsupport of the Class A1 uses.   The geometric mean of E.  coli in the seven samples collected from April to September 2005 (461 orgs/100 ml) also exceeds the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml; six of the seven samples (86%) exceeded Iowa’s single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.  

The IDNR/UHL ambient station SW of Waterloo (station 10070004) was monitored weekly for indicator bacteria during the recreational seasons of 2004 and 2005.   Using these additional data, five sample/30-day geometric means were calculated and compared to the respective Class A1 criteria.   Results show that 29 of 30 geometric means in 2004, and all 27 geometric means in 2005, exceeded the Iowa Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml.   Thus, when summarized by the five sample/30-day geometric means, the monitoring data from this station continue to strongly suggest impairment of the Class A1 primary contact recreation uses.  

The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supported" based on results of monitoring from the IDNR/UHL ambient station SW of Waterloo (STORET Station 10070004) from 2004 through 2006.   Monitoring at this station showed no violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for ammonia-nitrogen in the 39 samples analyzed during the 2004-2006 assessment period.   One of the 39 samples analyzed did exceed the Class B(WW1) criterion for dissolved oxygen, and one sample exceeded the Class B(WW1) criterion for pH.   According to U.S.  EPA guidelines (U.S.  EPA 1997b, page 3-17), however, a violation frequency of less than 10% for conventional parameters such as dissolved oxygen and pH suggest "full support" of aquatic life uses.   Thus, the percentages of criteria violations for these parameters at this station (both 3%) do not suggest an impairment of aquatic life uses in this stream segment.   In addition, no violations of state criteria for toxic metals occurred in the ten samples analyzed during the assessment period from this monitoring station.   None of the seven samples analyzed during this period for pesticides contained violations of Class B(WW1) criteria.   Similarly, none of the seven sample collected as part of IDNR/UHL TMDL monitoring in 2005 at station 11700005 contained violations of Class B(WW1) criteria for dissolved oxygen, pH, or ammonia.  

Fish consumption uses remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported” based on results of U.S.EPA/IDNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Hudson in 2004  The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish and smallmouth bass had very low levels of contaminants.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of channel catfish fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.072 ppm; total PCBs: 0.092 ppm; and technical chlordane: 0.044 ppm.   Levels of primary contaminants in the composite sample of smallmouth bass fillets were as follows: mercury: 0.098 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: < 0.03 ppm.   The existence of, or potential for, a fish consumption advisory is the basis for Section 305(b) assessments of the degree to which Iowa’s lakes and rivers support their fish consumption uses.   Prior to 2006, IDNR used action levels published by the U.S Food and Drug Administration to determine whether consumption advisories should be issued for fish caught as part of recreational fishing in Iowa.   In an effort to make Iowa’s consumption more compatible with the various protocols used by adjacent states, the Iowa Department of Public Health, in cooperation with Iowa DNR, developed a risk-based advisory protocol.   This protocol went into effect in January 2006 (see http://www.iowadnr.gov/fish/news/consump.html for more information on Iowa’s revised fish consumption advisory protocol).   Because the revised (2006) protocol is more restrictive than the previous protocol based on FDA action levels; fish contaminant data that previously suggested “full support” may now suggest either a threat to, or impairment of, fish consumption uses.   This scenario, however, does not apply to the fish contaminant data generated from the 2004 RAFT sampling conducted in this assessment segment:  the levels of contaminants do not exceed any of the new (2006) advisory trigger levels, thus suggesting no justification for issuance of a consumption advisory.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
12/5/2006 Fixed Monitoring End Date
9/12/2005 Fixed Monitoring End Date
4/21/2005 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/2/2004 Fish Tissue Monitoring
1/8/2004 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
420 Water column surveys (e.g. fecal coliform)
260 Fish tissue analysis
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
Monitoring Levels
Biological 0
Habitat 0
Physical Chemistry 3
Toxic 3
Pathogen Indicators 3
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 0
BioIntegrity N/A
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Pathogens Primary Contact Recreation High
  • Source Unknown
  • High