Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Elk Run IA 02-CED-544

mouth (S6 T88N R12W Black Hawk Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in S27 T89N R12W Black Hawk Co.

Assessment Cycle
2014
Result Period
2010 - 2012
Designations
Class A1 Class B(WW-2)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Not Assessed
Integrated Report
Category 3a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0360_0
Overall Use Support
Not assessed
Aquatic Life Use Support
Not assessed
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment historically based on 1999 IDNR/SHL biological sampling data: FIBI = 73 (excellent), BMIBI = 64 (good). Non-riffle habitat FIBI BIC = 44, natural substrate BMIBI BIC = 70. Assessment of aquatic life uses changed from "fully supporting" to "not assessed" for the 2012 cycle due to age of data (> 10 years).

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(LR) aquatic life uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008, this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses.   The stream remains designated for aquatic life uses (now termed Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses).   Thus, for the current assessment, the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW2) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY/EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The previous (2010) assessment of the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses was changed from “fully supporting” to “not assessed” for the 2012 IR cycle due to age of the data upon which the assessment was based.   That is, because the data upon which these assessment were based are now more than ten years old, the Class B(WW2) uses are now considered “not assessed.”  As water quality data age, they are less able to represent current water quality conditions.   As data age beyond ten years, their ability to represent current water quality conditions is increasing suspect.   Additional monitoring is needed in this assessment segment to update status of its aquatic communities.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
10/5/1999 Biological Monitoring
10/5/1999 One-time Chemical Monitoring
Methods
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Good