Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Rodgers Park Lake IA 02-CED-526

Benton County S1T86NR11W 3.5 mi NW of Vinton.

Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Overall IR
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trophic
Eutrophic
Trend
Stable
Created
12/17/2021 10:52:43 AM
Updated
2/3/2022 1:08:43 PM
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation - Primary contact
Not Supported
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
New
Source
Agriculture
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2022
Impairment Rationale
Narrative criteria violation: aesthetically objectionable conditions
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes
TMDL Priority
Tier I
Class BLW
Aquatic Life - Lakes and wetlands
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health -
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
Cycle Added Class Cause Data Source Rationale
2018 Class BLW Organic Enrichment: Low Dissolved Oxygen Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-lakes New data: WQ improvement (chemical / physical / bacterial)
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to the presence of aesthetically objectionable conditions caused by algal blooms. The Class BLW use was assessed as “fully supported.” All other designated uses were “not assessed.”

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2016-2020

22060002

Rodgers Lake

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria: No Data

Class A1 - pH

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22060002

6

15 / 5

7.5

8.9

8.2

0

4

NO

Monitored

FULL

Class A1 - Lake TSI's

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Median Value

Median TSI Violation?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22060002

6

Chlorophyll a TSI

15 / 5

36

83

66

YES

Monitored

NOT

22060002

6

Secchi TSI

14 / 5

42

77

66

YES

Monitored

NOT

22060002

6

Total Phosphorus TSI

15 / 5

53

92

73

NA

NA

NA

22060002

6

Fixed suspended solids

15 / 5

0.4

12

3

NA

NA

NA

Class BLW - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

22060002

6

Ammonia

15 / 5

0.0003

0.412

0.12

NA

0 / 0

4

NO

Monitored

FULL

22060002

6

Dissolved Oxygen

15 / 5

3.6

19.2

10

1

NA / NA

4

NO

Monitored

FULL

22060002

6

pH

15 / 5

7.5

8.9

8.2

0

NA / NA

4

NO

Monitored

FULL

22060002

6

Temperature

15 / 5

18.5

27.6

23.6

0

NA / NA

4

NO

Monitored

FULL

Rodgers Lake was assessed as "not supported" for the 2018 assessment/listing cycle based on Dissolved Oxygen. Based on DNR’s assessment methodology 2 consecutive assessment/listing cycles without significantly greater than 10% of the samples violating the single-sample maximum criterion are necessary to propose delisting based on Dissolved Oxygen violations. There were less than 10% of the samples exceeding the single-sample maximum criterion for the 2020 or current 2022 assessment listing cycle. Therefore, the impairment for Dissolved Oxygen is suggested for delisting for the 2022 assessment/listing cycle.

Class BLW - Lake Planktonic Cyanobacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples

Maximum Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Maximum Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Wet Mass

Median Cyanobacteria % Composition

Median Cyanobacteria Concentration = 75th Percentile

Assessment Type

Support Level

22060002

6

6

219.39

87.8%

1.01

3.3%

NO

Evaluated

NA

Class HH - No Data

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
6/7/2016
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/15/2020
Fixed Monitoring End Date
Methods
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
340
Primary producer surveys (phytoplankton/periphyton/macrophyton)