Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Lime Creek IA 02-CED-524

mouth (SW 1/4 S4 T86N R10W Benton Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in S1 T87N R10W Buchanan Co.

Assessment Cycle
2004
Result Period
2000 - 2002
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5b
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0270_1
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Fish Consumption
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on results of (1) IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) monitoring in 2000 (Fish IBI= 78, BM-IBI= 78 (both - excellent)); (2) ISU statewide survey of freshwater mussels in 1998-99 and (3) 1999 Fisheries data: Fish IBI = 69 (good).

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(WW) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on results of the 1998-99 statewide assessment of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams by Arbuckle et al.  (2000).   Results of IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) monitoring in 2000 and Fisheries monitoring in 1999, however, suggest "full support" of these aquatic life uses based on sampling of the fish and benthic macroinvertebrate communities.   Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.  

EXPLANATION:  Results from the IDNR/UHL biocriteria sampling in 2000 and Fisheries sampling in 1999 suggest that the Class B(WW) uses are "fully supported."  The 2000 Fish IBI score was 78 (excellent), the BM-IBI score was 78 (excellent) and the 1999 Fisheries Fish IBI score was 69 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as fully supported (=FS), based on a comparison of the F-IBI and BM-IBI scores with biological assessment criteria established specifically for the 2002 Section 305(b) report.  The biological assessment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2001.  

Results from the 1998-99 statewide assessment of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams, however, suggest an impairment to the aquatic life uses of this stream segment.   As part of this study, sampling results from 1998 and 1999 (Arbuckle et al.  2000) were compared to results from stream sites surveyed in 1984 and 1985 by Frest (1987).   For purposes of Section 303(d) listing, this assessment was based on the percent change in the number of species of freshwater mussels found in the 1984-85 survey versus the 1998-99 survey.   For stream segments having four or more species reported for the 1984-95 survey, results of this comparison were used by staff of the Iowa DNR to assess the degree to which the aquatic life uses of the sampled stream segments are supported.   Greater than a 50% decline in species richness from the 1984-85 to the 1998-99 period suggests an impairment of the aquatic life uses.   Species richness of freshwater mussels at the one sample site in this segment of Lime Creek was 9 in the 1984-85 period and was 0 in the 1998-99 period for a percent change of minus 100%.   Based on these results, the aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as “not supported.”  The confidence level of this assessment is relatively high; thus the assessment type is considered “monitored” in the context of Section 305(b) reporting.   According to Iowa DNR’s assessment methodology, waterbodies identified as “impaired” based on a “monitored” assessment are candidates for Section 303(d) listing.   As presented by Arbuckle et al.  (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen).   Their study also suggested the importance of stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness.  

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/9/2000 Biological Monitoring
8/9/2000 One-time Chemical Monitoring
9/30/1999 Biological Monitoring
1/1/1999 Biological Monitoring
9/30/1984 Biological Monitoring
Methods
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 3
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Flow alteration Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate