Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Sugar Creek IA 02-CED-492

from confluence with unnamed tributary in SW 1/4 S4 T80N R2W (Cedar Co.) to headwaters (NE 1/4 S33 T82N R2W Cedar Co.)

Assessment Cycle
2008
Result Period
2004 - 2006
Designations
General Use
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Evaluated
Integrated Report
Category 2a
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0170_4
Overall Use Support
Fully
Aquatic Life Use Support
Fully
Primary Contact Recreation
Not assessed
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment based on results of (1) IDNR/UHL biocriteria sampling in 2001: FIBI = 50 (fair); BMIBI = 57 (good) and (2) TMDL monitoring in 2001. FIBI BIC = 36, BMIBI BIC = 51.

Basis for Assessment

[Note:  Prior to the current (2008) Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was classified only for general uses.   Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S.  EPA in February 2008 (see http://www.iowadnr.com/water/standards/files/06mar_swc.pdf), this segment is now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and for Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.   According to the Iowa Water Quality Standards, all perennial rivers and streams and all intermittent streams with perennial pools that are not specifically listed in the Iowa surface water classification are designated as Class A1 and Class B(WW1) waters.   Thus, for the current (2008) assessment, perennial flow is presumed, and the available water quality monitoring data will be compared to the applicable Class A1 and Class B(WW1) water quality criteria.]

SUMMARY:  The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are "not assessed" due to the lack of information upon which to base an assessment.   The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported."  Sources of information for this assessment include (1) results of biological monitoring conducted in 2001 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project and (2) water quality monitoring conducted at one site in this segment from March to November 2001 by IDNR and UHL in support of TMDL development.   The 2001 sampling data are now greater than five years old; therefore, this assessment is now considered "evaluated" instead of "monitored".  

EXPLANATION:  The presumptive Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "fully supported" based on results of biological monitoring conducted in 2001.   The biological assessment was based on data collected in 2001 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project.   The 2001 FIBI score was 50 (fair) and the BMIBI score was 57 (good).   The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as Fully Supported (=FS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 36 and the BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 51.   Even though this site passed both the FIBI and BMIBI BICs, it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because it is a small general use stream and doesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size.  

Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring conducted in 2001 in support of TMDL development show no violations of Class B(WW1) state water quality criteria for conventional parameters and ammonia-nitrogen in the nine monthly samples collected between March and November 2001 at the site 2 miles E of Tipton (Site 9) (the maximum value of ammonia-nitrogen was 0.12 mg/l).   These results also suggest "full support" of the aquatic life uses.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
11/14/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/23/2001 Biological Monitoring
3/14/2001 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
150 Monitoring data more than 5 years old
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 2
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 1
BioIntegrity Good
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Organic enrichment/Low DO Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Agriculture
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Not Impairing
  • Channelization
  • Hydromodification
  • Not Impairing
  • Not Impairing