Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Mud Creek IA 02-CED-488

mouth (S10 T78N R2W Muscatine Co.) to confluence with unnamed tributary in S5 T78N R1E Muscatine Co.

Assessment Cycle
2002
Result Period
1998 - 2000
Designations
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 0
Legacy ADBCode
IA 02-CED-0160_0
Overall Use Support
Not supporting
Aquatic Life Use Support
Not supporting
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Habscrs/fshscrs: 26/12; 16/10. (1997v.) Fish IBI scores: 18,20,18,18,32,34. Downstr>Upstr. 1996 Biocriteria: Fish (1999v.) IBI= 43,38 (fair), 18,18,16,13 (poor); BM-IBI= 33,34 (fair), 20,20,27 (poor), 34(fair).

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) uses remained assessed as "not supported."  Sources of information for this assessment include (1) results of biological monitoring conducted at six sites in 1996 as part of the DNR/UHL watershed assessment project and (2) water quality monitoring conducted at five sites in this stream segment from March to November 2001 by IDNR and UHL in support of TMDL development.   EXPLANATION:  The Class B(LR) uses remain assessed as "not supported" based on results of biological monitoring conducted in 1996 (see assessment for the 2000 report above).   Results of monitoring conducted in 2001 in support of TMDL development, however, show only one violations of Class B(LR) water quality criteria for conventional parameters and ammonia-nitrogen in the nine monthly samples collected between March and November 2001:  the level of dissolved oxygen in the sample collected at Site 3 downstream from Durant on August 16, 2001 (4.7 mg/l) violated the water quality criterion of 5.0 mg/l.   Although no violations of Class B(LR) criteria for ammonia-nitrogen occurred, the maximum levels were moderately high for Iowa streams (downstream to upstream):  0.48 mg/l at Site 1 SE of Wilton, 0.70 mg/l at Site 2 upstream from Wilton, 0.49 mg/l at Site 3 downstream from Durant, 0.42 mg/l at Site 4 at the SE edge of Durant, and 0.19 mg/l at Site 5 upstream from Durant.   Four of the six maximum ammonia values occurred on August 16.   Biological monitoring is better able to reflect cumulative impacts of water quality over time and thus is believed to more accurately represent water quality conditions of this segment of Mud Creek than do results from the 2001 monthly TMDL monitoring sites.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
11/14/2001 Fixed Monitoring End Date
3/14/2001 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
9/24/1996 Biological Monitoring
Methods
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 2
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 6
BioIntegrity Poor
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Organic enrichment/Low DO Overall Use Support High
  • Agriculture
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Municipal Point Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Moderate
Organic enrichment/Low DO Aquatic Life Support High
  • Agriculture
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Municipal Point Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Moderate
Nutrients Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Municipal Point Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Moderate
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Municipal Point Sources
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • High
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Habitat Modification (other than Hydromodification)
  • Hydromodification
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Removal of Riparian Vegetation
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Habitat Modification (other than Hydromodification)
  • Hydromodification
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Removal of Riparian Vegetation
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Siltation Overall Use Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Habitat Modification (other than Hydromodification)
  • Hydromodification
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Removal of Riparian Vegetation
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Agriculture
  • Bank or Shoreline Modification/Destabilization
  • Channelization
  • Crop-related Sources
  • Grazing related Sources
  • Habitat Modification (other than Hydromodification)
  • Hydromodification
  • Pasture grazing - Riparian
  • Removal of Riparian Vegetation
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate
  • Moderate