Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Cedar River IA 02-CED-477

from upper end of Nashua Impoundment (Chickasaw/Floyd county line (W line S7 T94N R14W Chickasaw Co.)) to Dam No. 2 at Charles City in NW 1/4 NE 1/4 S12 T95N R16W Floyd Co.

Assessment Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
12/22/2021 6:56:48 AM
Updated
3/30/2022 9:32:29 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2022 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation
Primary contact
Not Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life
Warm Water Type 1
Fully Supported
Class HH
Human Health
Not Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Potential fish consumption advisory; additional sampling needed
Data Source
Fish contaminant monitoring: Iowa DNR
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to violations of Class A1 criteria for indicator bacteria (E. coli). The Class BWW1 use was assessed as "fully supported" based on biological sampling data and water quality monitoring data. The Class HH (fish consumption) use remains assessed as "not supported" based on fish tissue sampling data. Note: A TMDL for the bacteria impairment in the Cedar River was prepared and was approved by EPA in February 2010. However, this segment was not included in the TMDL; therefore, the bacteria impairment of the Class A1 primary contact recreation use for this segment remains in IR Category 5a (TMDL needed).

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2018-2020

10340001

Cedar River near Charles City (DS1)

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

285

Cedar River

Carrville/Charles City

Iowa DNR

6

FT

See Below

61

Cedar River

At Midway

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020)

2018 Geometric Mean

2019 Geometric Mean

2020 Geometric Mean

Violates Annual Geometric Mean?

# 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10340001

6

7/8/8

153

151

39

YES

3 / 3

3 / 3

0 / 3

YES

Monitored

Not

Class A - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10340001

6

36 / 3

7.1

8.6

8.1

0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

Class BWW1 - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10340001

6

Ammonia

36 / 3

0.025

0.9

0.1

NA

0 / 0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Chloride

36 / 3

8.8

36

21.5

NA

0 / 0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Dissolved Oxygen

36 / 3

7.3

14.8

10.7

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

pH

36 / 3

7.1

8.6

8.1

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Sulfate

36 / 3

8.1

32

21.2

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Temperature

36 / 3

0.1

26.4

10.7

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

Class BWW1 - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

>1 Acute / Chronic Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

10340001

6

Aluminum

14 / 3

2.2

0.4

0.1

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Arsenic

13 / 3

10

5.21

6.1

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Cadmium

13 / 3

0.08

0.03

0.02

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Chromium

13 / 3

1.2

0.9

0.9

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Lead

13 / 3

0.18

0.11

0.1

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Nickel

13 / 3

3.5

2.7

2.7

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Silver

13 / 3

0.025

0.025

0.025

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10340001

6

Zinc

13 / 3

3.3

1.9

1.8

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Biological Sampling:


Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage

BM Sample Gear

BMIBI score

BMIBI Class

47c BMIBI BIT

BMIBI Pass/ Fail

285

8/9/20

1095

47c

MS

Floating Art Sub

76

Excellent

52

Pass

285

8/15/16

1095

47c

MS

Hess

86

Excellent

70

Pass

Overall:

Community

Assessment Type

Assessment Result

Support Level

IR Category

Reason

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Evaluated

Pass (2/2)

Full

Assessment was evaluated because the drainage area of the sample site

Overall

Evaluated

Pass

Full

1

was greater than the calibrated range.


Class BWW1 - Continuous DO Monitoring:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Days Monitoring (2016/2017/2018/ 2019/2020)

DO Criteria Type

# 2016 violations / Violations needed for impairment

# 2017 violations / Violations needed for impairment

# 2018 violations / Violations needed for impairment

# 2019 violations / Violations needed for impairment

# 2020 violations / Violations needed for impairment

Violates Annual Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

24 hr

0/5

NA

NA

NA

NA

No

285

6

24/0/0/0/0

16 hr

0/5

NA

NA

NA

NA

No

Evaluated

Full


Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling:

Site ID

Biopart

Year

Species

# in sample / # of samples

Avg Length (cm)

(Avg) Hg (ppm)

Chlordane (ppm)

Sum PCBs (ppm)

61

fillet

2012

channel catfish

5

40.6

0.172

0.03

0.09

61

tissue plug

2014

smallmouth bass

4

35.1

0.27

61

tissue plug

2012

smallmouth bass

5

37.9

0.464

Support Level

Not

A one meal/week mercury consumption advisory for any predator fish exists on this segment. Based on IR Methodology, the Class HH (fish consumption) use was assessed as “not supported.”

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/22/2014
Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/15/2016
Biological Monitoring
1/8/2018
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/7/2020
Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/9/2020
Biological Monitoring
9/12/2012
Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
222
Non-fixed-station monitoring (conventional during key seasons and flows)
230
Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
260
Fish tissue analysis
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring