Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Cedar River IA 02-CED-477

from upper end of Nashua Impoundment (Chickasaw/Floyd county line (W line S7 T94N R14W Chickasaw Co.)) to Dam No. 2 at Charles City in NW 1/4 NE 1/4 S12 T95N R16W Floyd Co.

Assessment Cycle
2018
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
5/21/2019 7:15:34 AM
Updated
7/11/2019 11:30:48 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2018 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Partially Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2008
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
TMDL Priority
Tier III
Class BWW1
WINOFI
Biological: low aquatic macroinvertebrate IBI
Support Level
Water in Need of Further Investigation (WINOFI)
Impairment Code
3b-u - Use potentially biologically impaired based on uncalibrated IBI metrics.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
Class HH
Partially Supported
Fish Consumption Advisory: Mercury
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
5a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL needed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2014
Impairment Rationale
Potential fish consumption advisory; additional sampling needed
Data Source
Fish contaminant monitoring: Iowa DNR
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
General Use
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" due to violations of Class A1 criteria for indicator bacteria during recreational seasons of 2012 through 2014.  The Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are assessed (evaluated) as "partially supporting" based on results of biological monitoring in 2012-2016.  The fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as "fully supporting/threatened" (impaired) based on results of fish contaminant monitoring in 2012 that showed an elevated level of mercury in predator fish.  The primary sources of data for this assessment are (1) results of DNR ambient monthly monitoring approximately 4 miles southeast of Charles City (STORET station 10340001) from 2014 through 2016, (2) results of DNR/SHL benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring in 2012-2016 and (3) results of U.S. EPA/DNR fish tissue (RAFT) monitoring 4 miles southeast of Charles City in 2012 and 2014. 

Assessment Explanation

[Note: A TMDL for indicator bacteria impairments in eight segments of Cedar River was prepared and approved by EPA in February 2010. Because the bacterial impairment in this segment (IA 02-CED-0110_1) was not included in the EPA TMDL, this impairment is considered appropriate for Category 5a of Iowa's Integrated Report.]

The Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on levels of indicator bacteria that exceeded state water quality criteria. The geometric means of indicator bacteria (E. coli) in the 24 samples collected during the recreational seasons of 2014 through 2016 at DNR station 10340001 near Charles City were as follows: the 2014 geometric mean was 134 orgs/100 ml, the 2015 geometric mean was 98 orgs/100 ml, and the 2016 geometric mean was 150 orgs/100 ml. Two of the three recreation season geometric means exceeded the Class A1 geometric mean criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. Four of the combined 24 samples (17%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and Iowa DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean is greater than 126 orgs/100 ml., the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35 of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because at least one recreation season geometric mean exceeded criteria for Class A1 uses, these uses are assessed as "partially supported."

Results of chemical/physical water quality monitoring at DNR station 10340001 near Charles City also/ however/ suggest “full support” of the aquatic life uses. Monitoring showedno violations of Class B(WW1) water quality criteria for 35 Ammonia samples (maximum = 1.9 mg/L), 36 Dissolved Oxygen samples (minimum = 8.1 mg/L), 35 pH samples (range = 7.5 to 8.8), 36 Temperature samples (maximum = 25.6°C), 36 Chloride samples (maximum = 49 mg/L), or 36 Sulfate samples (maximum = 39 mg/L) occurred during monitoring from January 2014 to December 2016.According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), the EPA guidelines allow up to 10% violations of these conventional parameters before impairment of water quality is indicated. Thus, these results thus suggest “full support” of the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses.

In contrast to the water quality aquatic life assessment, the aquatic life assessment based on biological sampling suggests the Class B(WW1) aquatic life uses are "partially supporting". This evaluated biological assessment was based on data collected in 2011-2014as part of the DNR/SHL stream nutrient sampling project. A series of biological metrics that reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI). The index rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2012-2016 BMIBI scores were 86 (excellent), 50 (fair) and 27, 27 (both poor). The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established from a statistical analysis of biological data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2008. The artificial substrate BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 52 and the natural substrate BMIBI BIC is 70. This assessment is considered evaluated because the drainage area (1095 mi2) above this sampling site was greater than the maximum limit (500 mi2) that was used to calibrate the Iowa wadeable stream impairment criteria. The BMIBI score of 86 was a natural substrate sample and passed the natural substrate BIC of 70. The 27, 27 and 50 BMIBI scores were artificial substrate scores and they failed the artificial substrate BIC of 52. Even though this site failed the BMIBI BICs (1/4), it is uncertain as to whether or not this segment is meeting the aquatic life criteria because the site used for the assessmentdoesn’t fall in the calibrated watershed size. According to DNR’s assessment/listing methodology, impairments based on “evaluated” assessments are of lesser confidence and are thus not appropriate for Section 303(d) listing (Category 5 of the Integrated Report). DNR does, however, consider these impairments as appropriate for listing under either Category 2b or 3b of the Integrated Report (waters potentially impaired and in need of further investigation).

Fish consumption uses are assessed (monitored) as “fully supported/threatened” (impaired) based on results of U.S.EPA/DNR fish contaminant (RAFT) monitoring near Midway in 2012. This monitoring showed an increase in levels of mercury in predator species in this river segment.The composite samples of fillets from channel catfish continued to have low levels of contaminants: mercury: 0.172 ppm; total PCBs: 0.09 ppm; and technical chlordane: < 0.03 ppm. Levels of mercury in tissue plug samples of smallmouth bass, however, were much higher than in the 2003 composite samples of smallmouth bass fillets. The average level of mercury in the tissue plugs from five smallmouth bass was 0.464 ppm (SD=0.089 ppm; maximum=0.572; minimum=0.344). The average and minimum levels of mercury were well below Iowa’s “do not eat” advisory threshold of 1.0 ppm but were above Iowa’s threshold for issuance of a one meal per week fish consumption advisory. According to the DNR/DPH advisory protocol, two consecutive samplings showing that contaminant levels are above the advisory threshold level are needed to justify issuance of a consumption advisory.

Because, however, levels of mercury in the 2012 sampling of smallmouth bass were well-above the one-meal/week advisory threshold, the fish consumption uses of this segment are assessed as “fully supported/threatened”. Waters assessed as “threatened” demonstrate an adverse water quality trend such that impairment is anticipated within the next two years. Waters assessed as “fully supported/threatened” are thus candidates for addition to a states list of Section 303(d) (impaired) waters (IR Category 5).

Follow-up monitoring in 2014 showed that the average concentration of mercury in tissue plugs from four smallmouth Bass (0.27 ppm) was below the one meal/week consumption advisory threshold of 0.3 ppm thus indicating lower levels of mercury and the lack of need to issue a consumption advisory for this river segment. According to Iowa DNR assessment/listing guidelines, two consecutive fish tissue samplings showing that average levels of mercury are below the advisory threshold are needed to de-list the existing impairment. Follow-up fish tissue monitoring will be conducted in this assessment segment to determine whether this impairment should be removed.

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/12/2012 Fish Tissue Monitoring
9/22/2014 Fish Tissue Monitoring
8/15/2016 Biological Monitoring
1/7/2014 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/6/2016 Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/7/2012 Biological Monitoring
9/4/2013 Biological Monitoring
9/8/2014 Biological Monitoring
Methods
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
260 Fish tissue analysis
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring