Cedar River IA 02-CED-451
from Rock Run Cr. (S28 T80NR3W Cedar Co ) to Hwy 30 bridge at Cedar Rapids in S9 T82N R6W Linn Co.
- Assessment Cycle
- 2022
- Release Status
- Final
- Data Collection Period
- Overall IR Category
- 5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
- Trend
- Unknown
- Created
- 12/22/2021 6:00:23 AM
- Updated
- 1/4/2022 9:50:43 AM
The Class A1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BWW1 use remains assessed as "not supported" based on results of a 1998-99 statewide survey of freshwater mussels. The Class HH (fish consumption) use was assessed as "fully supported" based on fish tissue sampling data. Note: A TMDL for indicator bacteria in this segment of Cedar River was prepared and approved by EPA in February 2010. The approval of this TMDL moved the bacteria impairment for this segment from Iowa's list of Section 303(d) waters (Category 5a of the IR) to IR Category 4a.
Data Sources: Data Source Data Source ID Data Type Data Age Site ID Site Name Site Description Iowa DNR 6 WQ CY 2018-2020 10570001 Cedar River Downstream of Cedar Rapids (DS1)
Iowa DNR 6 BIO See Below 952 Cedar
River Cedar
Rapids – DS1 Iowa DNR 6 FT See Below 371 Cedar
River West
of Cedar Bluff Class A1 -
Indicator Bacteria: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020) 2018 Geometric Mean 2019 Geometric Mean 2020 Geometric Mean Violates Annual Geometric Mean? # 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations
needed for impairment # 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations
needed for impairment # 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations
needed for impairment Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10%
Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 10570001 6 8/8/8 245 255 65 YES 5 / 3 4 / 3 2 / 3 YES Monitored Not Class A – pH: Site ID Data Source ID # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 10570001 6 36 / 3 7 8.9 8.3 0 7 NO Monitored Full Class BWW1 -
Conventional Parameters: Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value # Violations # Acute / Chronic Violations Violations needed for impairment Violates Significantly >10% Rule? Assessment Type Support Level 10570001 6 Ammonia 36 / 3 0.02 0.79 0.12 NA 0 / 0 7 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Chloride 36 / 3 11 43 25 NA 0 / 0 7 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Dissolved Oxygen 36 / 3 7.6 15.4 11.6 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 pH 36 / 3 7 8.9 8.3 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Sulfate 36 / 3 13 49 26 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Temperature 36 / 3 0.3 28.6 12.5 0 NA / NA 7 NO Monitored Full Class BWW1 -
Toxic Parameters: Site ID Data Source ID Parameter Name # Samples / # Years Maximum Value Mean Value Median Value # Acute / Chronic Violations >1 Acute / Chronic Violation Assessment Type Support Level 10570001 6 Aluminum 14 / 3 1.7 0.6 0.4 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Arsenic 13 / 3 2.3 1.5 1.6 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Cadmium 13 / 3 0.08 0.04 0.02 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Chromium 13 / 3 1.1 0.8 0.8 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Lead 13 / 3 0.26 0.13 0.11 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Nickel 13 / 3 3.5 2.7 2.8 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Silver 13 / 3 0.025 0.025 0.025 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full 10570001 6 Zinc 13 / 3 3.6 2.1 1.9 0 / 0 NO Monitored Full Site ID Date Drainage Area (mi2) Ecoregion Major Drainage BM Sample Gear BMIBI score BMIBI Class 47f BMIBI BIT BMIBI Pass/ Fail 952 8/30/19 6955 47f MS Floating Art Sub 65 Good 51 Pass Overall: Community Assessment Type Assessment Result Support Level IR Category Reason Benthic
Macroinvertebrates Evaluated Pass (1/1) Full Assessment was evaluated
because the drainage area of the sample site Overall Evaluated Pass Full 1 was greater than the
calibrated range. Freshwater Mussel
Survey Avg. # Freshwater Mussel Species Avg. # Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease Avg % Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease Assessment Type Support Level IR Category 1984-85 (Frest 1987) 5
sites 5.6 1998-99 (Arbuckle et
al. 2000) 5 sites 0.4 -5 -92% Evaluated Not 5b As presented by
Arbuckle et al. (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness
of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream
substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients
(phosphorus and nitrogen). Their study also suggested the importance of
stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness. Site ID Biopart Year Species # in sample / # of samples Avg Length (cm) (Avg) Hg (ppm) Chlordane (ppm) Sum PCBs (ppm) 371 tissue plug 2020 channel catfish 15 46.1 0.086
371 tissue plug 2020 flathead catfish 10 44.1 0.167
371 tissue plug 2020 shovelnose sturgeon 16 59.8 0.142
371 tissue plug 2020 walleye 5 40 0.205
Support Level Full
Class BWW1 - Biological Sampling:
Benthic Macroinvertebrates:
Class BWW1 – Freshwater
Mussel Sampling:
Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling: