Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Cedar River IA 02-CED-451

from Rock Run Cr. (S28 T80NR3W Cedar Co ) to Hwy 30 bridge at Cedar Rapids in S9 T82N R6W Linn Co.

Assessment Cycle
2022
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
12/22/2021 6:00:23 AM
Updated
1/4/2022 9:50:43 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2022 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Not Supported
Bacteria: Indicator Bacteria- E. coli
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2002
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
Class BWW1
Not Supported
Biological: loss of native mussel species
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5b - Biological impairment or pollutant-caused fish kill - unknown source. No administrative action.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Loss of >50% of native mussel species
Data Source
Special project/study
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class HH
Fully Supported
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as "not supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BWW1 use remains assessed as "not supported" based on results of a 1998-99 statewide survey of freshwater mussels. The Class HH (fish consumption) use was assessed as "fully supported" based on fish tissue sampling data. Note: A TMDL for indicator bacteria in this segment of Cedar River was prepared and approved by EPA in February 2010. The approval of this TMDL moved the bacteria impairment for this segment from Iowa's list of Section 303(d) waters (Category 5a of the IR) to IR Category 4a.

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2018-2020

10570001

Cedar River Downstream of Cedar Rapids (DS1)

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

952

Cedar River

Cedar Rapids – DS1

Iowa DNR

6

FT

See Below

371

Cedar River

West of Cedar Bluff

Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples per Year (2018/ 2019/2020)

2018 Geometric Mean

2019 Geometric Mean

2020 Geometric Mean

Violates Annual Geometric Mean?

# 2018 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2019 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

# 2020 SSM violations / SSM Violations needed for impairment

Violates Annual SSM Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

8/8/8

245

255

65

YES

5 / 3

4 / 3

2 / 3

YES

Monitored

Not

Class A – pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

36 / 3

7

8.9

8.3

0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

Class BWW1 - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Minimum Value

Maximum Value

Mean Value

# Violations

# Acute / Chronic Violations

Violations needed for impairment

Violates Significantly >10% Rule?

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

Ammonia

36 / 3

0.02

0.79

0.12

NA

0 / 0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Chloride

36 / 3

11

43

25

NA

0 / 0

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Dissolved Oxygen

36 / 3

7.6

15.4

11.6

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

pH

36 / 3

7

8.9

8.3

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Sulfate

36 / 3

13

49

26

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Temperature

36 / 3

0.3

28.6

12.5

0

NA / NA

7

NO

Monitored

Full

Class BWW1 - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

>1 Acute / Chronic Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

Aluminum

14 / 3

1.7

0.6

0.4

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Arsenic

13 / 3

2.3

1.5

1.6

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Cadmium

13 / 3

0.08

0.04

0.02

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Chromium

13 / 3

1.1

0.8

0.8

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Lead

13 / 3

0.26

0.13

0.11

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Nickel

13 / 3

3.5

2.7

2.8

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Silver

13 / 3

0.025

0.025

0.025

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Zinc

13 / 3

3.6

2.1

1.9

0 / 0

NO

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Biological Sampling:


Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage

BM Sample Gear

BMIBI score

BMIBI Class

47f BMIBI BIT

BMIBI Pass/ Fail

952

8/30/19

6955

47f

MS

Floating Art Sub

65

Good

51

Pass

Overall:

Community

Assessment Type

Assessment Result

Support Level

IR Category

Reason

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Evaluated

Pass (1/1)

Full

Assessment was evaluated because the drainage area of the sample site

Overall

Evaluated

Pass

Full

1

was greater than the calibrated range.


Class BWW1 – Freshwater Mussel Sampling:

Freshwater Mussel Survey

Avg. # Freshwater Mussel Species

Avg. # Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease

Avg % Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease

Assessment Type

Support Level

IR Category

1984-85 (Frest 1987) 5 sites

5.6

1998-99 (Arbuckle et al. 2000) 5 sites

0.4

-5

-92%

Evaluated

Not

5b

As presented by Arbuckle et al. (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen). Their study also suggested the importance of stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness.


Class HH - Fish Tissue Sampling:

Site ID

Biopart

Year

Species

# in sample / # of samples

Avg Length (cm)

(Avg) Hg (ppm)

Chlordane (ppm)

Sum PCBs (ppm)

371

tissue plug

2020

channel catfish

15

46.1

0.086

371

tissue plug

2020

flathead catfish

10

44.1

0.167

371

tissue plug

2020

shovelnose sturgeon

16

59.8

0.142

371

tissue plug

2020

walleye

5

40

0.205

Support Level

Full

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/30/1999 Biological Monitoring
1/9/2018 Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/1/2020 Fixed Monitoring End Date
8/30/2019 Biological Monitoring
2/1/2010 TMDL Completed
8/30/1984 Biological Monitoring
7/1/2020 Fish Tissue Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
230 Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
260 Fish tissue analysis
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420 Indicator bacteria monitoring