Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Cedar River IA 02-CED-451

from Rock Run Cr. (S28 T80NR3W Cedar Co ) to Hwy 30 bridge at Cedar Rapids in S9 T82N R6W Linn Co.

Assessment Cycle
2020
Release Status
Final
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
8/28/2020 7:37:27 AM
Updated
10/16/2020 7:29:03 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2020 IR methodology
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation
Primary contact
Partially Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Partially Supported
Impairment Code
4a - Pollutant-caused impairment. TMDL has been completed.
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2002
Impairment Rationale
Geometric mean criterion exceeded
Data Source
Ambient monitoring: Iowa DNR-rivers
Class BWW1
Aquatic Life
Warm Water Type 1
Not Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5b - Biological impairment or pollutant-caused fish kill - unknown source. No administrative action.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Loss of >50% of native mussel species
Data Source
Special project/study
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Class HH
Human Health
Fully Supported
General Use
General Use water
Not Assessed
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class A1 use was assessed as "partially supported" due to levels of indicator bacteria (E. coli) that violated state water quality criteria. The Class BWW1 use remains assessed as "not supported" based on results of a 1998-99 statewide survey of freshwater mussels. The Class HH use was assessed as “fully supported” based on ambient water quality monitoring data. Note: A TMDL for indicator bacteria in this segment of Cedar River was prepared and approved by EPA in February 2010. The approval of this TMDL moved the bacteria impairment for this segment from Iowa's list of Section 303(d) waters (Category 5a of the IR) to IR Category 4a.

Assessment Explanation

Sources of Data:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

WQ

CY 2016-2018

10570001

Cedar River Downstream of Cedar Rapids (DS1)

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

952

Cedar River

Cedar Rapids -DS1


Class A1 - Indicator Bacteria:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

2016 Geometric Mean

2017 Geometric Mean

2018 Geometric Mean

Annual Geometric Mean Violation

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

24 / 3

233.44

97.95

244.65

Yes

11

46%

Yes

Monitored

Partial


Class A1 - pH:

Site ID

Data Source ID

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Violations

% Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

36 / 3

9.1

8.3

8.3

1

3%

No

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Conventional Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

Significantly >10% Violations

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

Ammonia

36 / 3

0.79

0.1

0.02

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Chloride

36 / 3

43

24

24

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Dissolved oxygen

36 / 3

17.2

11.6

11.7

NA / 0

NA / 0%

No

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

pH

36 / 3

9.1

8.3

8.3

1 / NA

3% / NA

No

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Sulfate

36 / 3

49

26

27

0 / NA

0% / NA

No

Monitored

Full

10570001

6

Temperature

36 / 3

27.8

12.6

12.4

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Monitored

Full


Class BWW1 - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

# Acute / Chronic Violations

% Acute/ Chronic Violations

>1 Acute / Chronic Violation

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

Aluminum

9 / 2

1.7

0.728

0.84

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Arsenic

9 / 2

2.3

1.7

1.6

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Cadmium

9 / 2

0.025

0.025

0.025

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Chromium

9 / 2

1.1

0.71

0.72

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Copper

9 / 2

3.5

1.21

1

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Lead

9 / 2

0.14

0.067

0.05

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Nickel

9 / 2

3.1

2.2

2.2

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Selenium

9 / 2

1.8

1.26

1.3

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Zinc

9 / 2

3.6

1.62

1.2

0 / 0

0% / 0%

No

Evaluated

Full


Class BWW1 - Biological Sampling:

Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

BioNet Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage/Thermal

BM Sample Gear

BMIBI score

BMIBI Class

47f BMIBI BIT

BMIBI Pass/ Fail

952

8/24/15

6955

47f

MS/WW

Float ArtSub

56

Good

51

Pass

952

10/11/14

6955

47f

MS/WW

Float ArtSub

52

Fair

51

Pass

Overall Assessment:

Community

Assessment Type

Assessment Result

Support Level

Earned IR Category

Actual IR Category

Reason

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Evaluated

Pass (2/2)

Full

1

1

Assessment is evaluated because the drainage area of the sample site is larger than calibrated range.


Class BWW1 – Freshwater Mussel Sampling:

Freshwater Mussel Survey

Avg. # Freshwater Mussel Species

Avg. # Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease

Avg % Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease

Assessment Type

Support Level

IR Category

1984-85 (Frest 1987) 5 sites

5.6

1998-99 (Arbuckle et al. 2000) 5 sites

0.4

-5

-92%

Evaluated

Not

5b

As presented by Arbuckle et al. (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen). Their study also suggested the importance of stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness.


Class HH-F - Toxic Parameters:

Site ID

Data Source ID

Parameter Name

# Samples / # Years

Maximum Value

Mean Value

Median Value

Number of Non - Detects

Mean Value > Criterion or MCL

Assessment Type

Support Level

10570001

6

Cadmium

9 / 2

0.025

0.025

0.025

9

No

All Non-Detect

Full

10570001

6

Chromium

9 / 2

1.1

0.71

0.72

0

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Copper

9 / 2

3.5

1.21

1

0

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Nickel

9 / 2

3.1

2.2

2.2

0

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Selenium

9 / 2

1.8

1.26

1.3

0

No

Evaluated

Full

10570001

6

Zinc

9 / 2

3.6

1.62

1.2

0

No

Evaluated

Full

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/30/1999
Biological Monitoring
1/5/2016
Fixed Monitoring Start Date
12/6/2018
Fixed Monitoring End Date
10/11/2014
Biological Monitoring
8/24/2015
Biological Monitoring
2/1/2010
TMDL Completed
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
230
Fixed station physical/chemical (conventional plus toxic pollutants)
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
420
Indicator bacteria monitoring