Iowa DNR
Iowa DNR
ADBNet
Water Quality Assessments
Impaired Waters List

Buck Creek IA 01-MAQ-45

mouth (S11 T87N R4W Delaware Co.) to Golden Branch in S11 T87N R5W Delaware Co.

Assessment Cycle
2024
Release Status
Pending
Data Collection Period
Overall IR Category
5 - Water is impaired or threatened and a TMDL is needed.
Trend
Unknown
Created
11/1/2023 8:12:28 AM
Updated
12/4/2023 10:46:26 AM
Assessment conducted in accordance with Iowa's 2024 IR methodology.
Use Support
Class A1
Recreation
Primary contact
Not Assessed
Class BWW2
Aquatic Life
Warm Water Type 2
Not Supported
Impairments
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5b-t - Biological - tentative
Cause Magnitude
Slight
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
Low
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Low Biotic Index
Data Source
Biological monitoring: Iowa DNR WQMA
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Support Level
Not Supported
Impairment Code
5b - Biological impairment or pollutant-caused fish kill - unknown source. No administrative action.
Cause Magnitude
Moderate
Status
Continuing
Source
Unknown: Source Unknown
Source Confidence
N/A
Cycle Added
2004
Impairment Rationale
Loss of >50% of native mussel species
Data Source
Special project/study
TMDL Priority
Tier IV
Impairment Delistings
No delistings for this assessment cycle.
Documentation
Assessment Summary

The Class BWW2 use was assessed as "not supported" based on information from the report "Statewide Assessment of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalva, Unionidae) in Iowa Streams" by Arbuckle et al. (2000) and also on biological sampling data. All other designated uses were "not assessed."

Assessment Explanation

Data Sources:

Data Source

Data Source ID

Data Type

Data Age

Site ID

Site Name

Site Description

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

239

Buck Creek

Delhi

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

1029

Buck Creek

BK001 – 3.5 miles west of Hopkinton

Iowa DNR

6

BIO

See Below

1030

Buck Creek

BK002 – 3 miles west of Hopkinton


Presumptive Class A1 – No Data

Class BWW2 - Biological Sampling:

Benthic Macroinvertebrates:

BioNet Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage

BM Sample Gear

BMIBI score

BMIBI Class

47c BMIBI BIT

BMIBI Pass/ Fail

239

8/16/01

27.6

47c

MS

Hess

54

Fair

70

Fail


Fish:

BioNet Site ID

Date

Drainage Area (mi2)

Ecoregion

Major Drainage

Riffle Stream?

FIBI score

FIBI Class

47c FIBI BIT

FIBI Pass/Fail

1029

8/15/22

45

47c

MS

Undetermined

65

Good

44

Pass

1030

8/4/22

46

47c

MS

Undetermined

65

Good

44

Pass

1029

8/3/21

45

47c

MS

Undetermined

62

Good

44

Pass

1030

8/2/21

46

47c

MS

Undetermined

59

Good

44

Pass

1029

7/30/20

45

47c

MS

Undetermined

58

Good

44

Pass

1030

7/28/20

46

47c

MS

Undetermined

63

Good

44

Pass

1029

7/26/19

45

47c

MS

Undetermined

68

Good

44

Pass

1030

7/29/19

46

47c

MS

Undetermined

63

Good

44

Pass

1030

9/17/18

46

47c

MS

Undetermined

62

Good

44

Pass


Overall Assessment:

Community

Assessment Type

Assessment Result

Support Level

IR Category

Reason

Benthic Macroinvertebrates

Evaluated

Fail (0/1)

Not

Fish

Monitored

Pass (9/9)

Full

Assessment was evaluated because the impairment was

Overall

Evaluated

Fail

Not

5bt

based on a single BMIBI sample in 2001.


Class BWW2 – Freshwater Mussel Sampling:

Freshwater Mussel Survey

# Freshwater Mussel Species

# Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease

% Freshwater Mussel Species Increase/Decrease

Assessment Type

Support Level

IR Category

1984-85 (Frest 1987)

6

1998-99 (Arbuckleet al. 2000)

1

-5

-83%

Evaluated

Not

5b

As presented by Arbuckle et al. (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen.) Their study also suggested the importance of stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness.


Class HH- No Data

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
9/30/1984
Biological Monitoring
9/30/1999
Biological Monitoring
8/16/2001
Biological Monitoring
8/15/2022
Biological Monitoring
8/4/2022
Biological Monitoring
8/2/2021
Biological Monitoring
8/3/2021
Biological Monitoring
9/17/2018
Biological Monitoring
7/26/2019
Biological Monitoring
7/29/2019
Biological Monitoring
7/28/2020
Biological Monitoring
7/30/2020
Biological Monitoring
Methods
120
Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
150
Monitoring data more than 5 years old
315
Regional reference site approach
320
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330
Fish surveys