Iowa DNR
ADBNet

Water Quality Assessments

Impaired Waters List

Buck Creek IA 01-MAQ-45

mouth (S11 T87N R4W Delaware Co.) to Golden Branch in S11 T87N R5W Delaware Co.

Assessment Cycle
2006
Result Period
2002 - 2004
Designations
Class B(LR)
Assessment Methodology
Assessment Type
Monitored
Integrated Report
Category 5b
Legacy ADBCode
IA 01-MAQ-0210_0
Overall Use Support
Partial
Aquatic Life Use Support
Partial
Documentation
Assessment Comments

Assessment is based on the results of (1) IDNR/UHL biological (biocriteria) sampling in 2001 and (2) the statewide survey of freshwater mussels conducted from 1998-99 (Arbuckle et al. 2000).

Basis for Assessment

SUMMARY:  The Class B(LR) aquatic life uses are assessed (monitored) as "partially supported" based on information from the report "Statewide Assessment of Freshwater Mussels (Bivalva, Unionidae) in Iowa Streams" by Arbuckle et al.  (2000).   The assessment was also based on data collected in 2001 as part of the DNR/UHL stream biocriteria project and follow-up sampling to assess recovery from a July 1998 fishkill.  

EXPLANATION:  Results of IDNR/UHL biological monitoring conducted in 2001 suggest that the aquatic life uses are "partially supported."  A series of biological metrics which reflect stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biocriteria sampling data.   The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa and fish species that were collected in the stream sampling reach.   The biological metrics were combined to make a fish community index of biotic integrity (FIBI) and a benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMIBI).   The indexes rank the biological integrity of a stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).   The 2001 FIBI score was 60 (good) and the BMIBI score was 54 (fair).   The aquatic life use support was assessed as partially supporting (=PS), based on a comparison of the FIBI and BMIBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for previous Section 305(b) reports.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at stream ecoregion reference sites from 1994-2004.   The non-riffle site FIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 44 and the natural substrate BMIBI BIC for this ecoregion is 70.

Results from the 1998-99 statewide assessment of freshwater mussels in Iowa streams also suggest an impairment to the aquatic life uses of this stream segment.   As part of this study, sampling results from 1998 and 1999 (Arbuckle et al.  2000) were compared to results from stream sites surveyed in 1984 and 1985 by Frest (1987).   In general, this comparison showed sharp declines in the numbers of mussel species ("species richness") from the mid-1980s to the late 1990s.   For purposes of Section 305(b) reporting, results of this comparison were used by staff of the Iowa DNR Water Quality Bureau to assess the degree to which the aquatic life uses of the sampled stream segments are supported.   This assessment was based on the percent change in the number of species of freshwater mussels found in the 1984-85 survey versus the 1998-99 survey with greater than a 50% decline in species richness from the 1984-84 to the 1998-99 period suggesting an impairment of the aquatic life uses.   Species richness of freshwater mussels at the one sample site in this segment of Buck Creek was 6 in the 1984-85 period and was 1 in the 1998-99 period for a percent change of -83%.   Based on a combination of these results with results of IDNR/UHL biociteria sampling in 2001, the Class B(LR) aquatic life uses are assessed as "partially supported."  As presented by Arbuckle et al.  (2000), the potential causes of declines in species richness of Iowa's freshwater mussels include siltation, destabilization of stream substrate, stream flow instability, and high instream levels of nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen).   Their study also suggested the importance of stream shading provided by riparian vegetation to mussel species richness.   Additional monitoring is needed to better define the biological status of this stream segment.   The possibility exists that the July 1998 fish kill in this stream segment negatively influenced sampling for freshwater mussels as conducted by Arbuckle et al.  (2000) (see the assessment developed for the 2000 report for more information on the July 1998 fish kill).

Monitoring and Methods
Assessment Key Dates
8/13/2001 Biological Monitoring
9/30/1999 Biological Monitoring
9/30/1984 Biological Monitoring
Methods
120 Surveys of fish and game biologists/other professionals
140 Incidence of spills and/or fish kills
220 Non-fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutant only)
315 Regional reference site approach
320 Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
330 Fish surveys
380 Quan. measurements of instream parms-- channel morphology-- floodplain-- 1-2 seasons-- by prof
Monitoring Levels
Biological 4
Habitat 4
Physical Chemistry 1
Toxic 0
Pathogen Indicators 0
Other Health Indicators 0
Other Aquatic Life Indicators 0
# of Bio Sites 2
BioIntegrity Fair
Causes and Sources of Impairment
Causes Use Support Cause Magnitude Sources Source Magnitude
Flow alteration Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Nutrients Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Other habitat alterations Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate
Siltation Aquatic Life Support Moderate
  • Source Unknown
  • Moderate