[Note: A TMDL for the bacterial impairment for streams in the Yellow River basin was prepared by IDNR in 2012 and was approved by U.S. EPA in February 2013 (see http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/WaterQuality/WatershedImprovement/WatershedResearchData/WaterImprovementPlans/PublicMeetingsPlans.aspx).  Due to completion of the TMDL, the Integrated Report category for the Class A1 recreational uses was changed from 5p (impaired; TMDL needed) to 4a (impaired; TMDL approved).  Because not all impairments identified for this assessment segment are covered by the TMDL (aquatic life impairment due to low dissolved oxygen), this segment remains in Category 5a of Iowa's Integrated Report (impaired and TMDL required).]

The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as impaired due to violations of Iowa’s water quality criteria for indicator bacteria.  The presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses, however, remain assessed (monitored) as “fully supported.”  The geometric mean of E. coli in the 34 samples collected at YRWP site 15030004 during the recreational seasons of 2006 through 2008 was 231 orgs/100 ml.  The 2006 geometric mean was 246 orgs/100 ml (N=22), the 2007 geometric mean was 148 orgs/100 ml (N=7), and the 2008 geometric mean was 322 orgs/100 ml (N=5).  All three recreation season geometric means slightly exceed the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml, thus suggesting impairment of the presumptive Class A1 uses.  Fifteen of the 34 samples (44%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml.  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean of E. coli is greater than the applicable state criterion, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "impaired" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S. EPA 1997b). 

The geometric mean of the 38 samples collected at this station during calendar years of 2006 through 2008 was 180 orgs/100 ml; this geometric mean is well below the Class A2 criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml.  The respective annual geometric means were 178 orgs/100 ml in 2006 (N=25), 106 orgs/100 ml in 2007 (N=8), and 322 orgs/100 ml in 2008 (N=5).  All three annual geometric means are well below the Class A2 geometric mean criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml.  Thus, these results suggest “full support” of the Class A2 uses.  Only one of the 38 samples (3%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A2 single-sample maximum criterion (2,880 orgs/100 ml.).  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting, if the geometric mean is less than the applicable state criterion, and if less than 10% of samples exceed the single-sample maximum criterion, the contact recreation uses should be assessed as "fully supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S. EPA 1997b). 

The Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as “partially supported.”  The results of the IDNR/SHL water quality monitoring from May 2004 through November 2006 showed 20 violations of the Class B(CW1) criteria for dissolved oxygen (7.0 mg/l) in the 73 samples (27%) collected.  The violations were relatively minor (lowest DO level = 4.5 mg/l).  Similar to results for other sites monitored as part of the Yellow River Watershed Project, 2005 was a year of low dissolved oxygen:  16 of the 20 violations occurred from April through November 2005.  According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) water quality assessments (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), "partial support" of aquatic life uses is indicated if criteria are exceeded in from 11 to 25% of the samples for conventional parameters (e.g., pH, temperature, or dissolved oxygen).  Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology, these results indicate that significantly more than 10 percent of the samples exceed Iowa’s Class B(CW1) dissolved oxygen criteria and thus suggest an impairment of the Class B(CW1) uses of Dousman Creek.  Note:  although IDNR station 15030004 was monitored for E. coli through September 2008, monitoring for dissolved oxygen was not conducted after November 2006.  Improved levels of dissolved oxygen at other stations in the Yellow River basin after 2005 (e.g., station 15960002 on the Yellow River [IA 01-YEL-0080_3]) suggest the potential for improved water quality in Dousman Creek as well. 

According to the January 2016 summary of trout reproduction in Iowa streams, this reach of Dousman Creek is in the category of Iowa trout streams that exhibit fairly consistent natural reproduction and maintain a viable population of the listed species (brown trout) without any stocking (a Category I stream).

The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was also based on data collected in 2003 as part of the SHL coldwater stream sampling project.  A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data.  The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach.  The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI).  The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).  The 2003 CBI score was 60.  The aquatic life use support was assessed (evaluated) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the CBI score with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report.  The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011.  The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 1/1 times in 2003. 

This aquatic life assessment is now considered "evaluated" based on a change in the 2010 IDNR assessment methodology.  IDNR now requires a segment have two or more biological samples collected from the segment in multiple years between over a five-year period to be considered “monitored”.  This segment had a single sample collected in 2003.  Additionally, because these data are now considered too old (greater than five years) to accurately characterize current water quality conditions, the assessment category is considered “evaluated” (indicating an assessment with relatively lower confidence) as opposed to "monitored" (indicating an assessment with relatively higher confidence). 

Fish consumption uses remain "not assessed" due to lack of fish tissue monitoring in this stream reach.