Assessment Comments
Assessment remains based on: (1) results of IDNR/SHL TMDL monitoring in 2009 at Yellow River Main Stem 1 near Hwy 52 crossing, (2) results of IDNR/SHL chemical/physical/bacterial water quality monitoring conducted from 2004-06 at station 15030003, (3) results of an investigation of a fish kill that occurred in March 2000, and (3) results of IDNR/SHL biological sampling in 2011 and 2012.
Basis for Assessment
[Note: Prior to the 2008 Section 305(b) cycle, this stream segment was designated only for Class B(CW) aquatic life uses. Due to changes in Iowa’s surface water classification that were approved by U.S. EPA in February 2008, this segment is also now presumptively designated for Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses. This segment remains designated for coldwater aquatic life use (now termed Class B(CW1) uses), and for fish consumption uses (now termed Class HH (human health/fish consumption) uses.]
SUMMARY: The presumptive Class A1 (primary contact recreation) uses and the presumptive Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses both remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported” (IR 4a) due to levels of indicator bacteria that exceed state water quality criteria. The Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as "not supported" (IR 5a) due to violations of water quality criterion for dissolved oxygen. A review of the information for the 2000 fish kill in this segment suggests an additional IR Category 5 (5b) impairment. Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment. Sources of data for this assessment include (1) results of IDNR/SHL TMDL monitoring at Yellow River Main Stem 1 (Station 11030001 near Hwy 52 crossing, Allamakee County) from mid-July to mid-September 2009, (2) results of IDNR/SHL chemical/physical water quality monitoring conducted from May 2004 through November 2006 as part of the Yellow River watershed project at the County Road W60 crossing (station 15030003), (3) results of IDNR/SHL bacteria monitoring conducted from January 2006 through September 2008 as part of the Yellow River watershed project at the County Road W60 crossing (station 15030003), (4) results of an investigation of a fish kill that occurred in March 2000, and (5) results of IDNR/SHL biological sampling in 2011 and 2012.
Note: A TMDL for the bacterial impairment for streams in the Yellow River basin was prepared by Iowa DNR in 2012 and was approved by U.S. EPA in February 2013 (see http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/WaterQuality/WatershedImprovement/WatershedResearchData/WaterImprovementPlans/PublicMeetingsPlans.aspx). Due to completion of the TMDL, the Integrated Report categories for the Class A1 and Class A2 recreational uses are changed from 5p (impaired; TMDL needed) to 4a (impaired; TMDL approved). Because not all impairments identified for this assessment segment are covered by the TMDL (aquatic life impairment due to low dissolved oxygen), this segment remains in Category 5a of Iowa's Integrated Report (impaired and TMDL required).
EXPLANATION: Both the Class A1 (primary contact recreation) and Class A2 (secondary contact recreation) uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported” due to violations of Iowa’s water quality criteria for indicator bacteria. The geometric mean of E. coli in the 13 samples collected at IDNR/UHL station 11030001 during the recreational season of 2009 was 13,288 orgs/100 ml. This geometric mean far exceeds the Class A1 criterion of 126 orgs/100 ml. All 13 samples (100%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A1 single-sample maximum criterion of 235 orgs/100 ml. This geometric mean also far exceeded the Class A2 criterion of 630 orgs/100 ml. Nine of the 13 samples (69%) exceeded Iowa’s Class A2 single-sample maximum criterion (2,880 orgs/100 ml.). According to U.S. EPA guidelines for Section 305(b) reporting and IDNR’s assessment/listing methodology, if the geometric mean of E. coli is greater than the applicable state criterion, the primary contact recreation uses should be assessed as "not supported" (see pgs 3-33 to 3-35of U.S. EPA 1997b). Thus, because the recreation season geometric mean for IDNR/SHL station 11030001 exceeds both the Class A1 and Class A2 criteria, these uses are assessed as “not supported.”
Although more recent (2009) monitoring shows improvement in water quality, the Class B(CW1) coldwater aquatic life uses remain assessed (monitored) as “not supported.” The results of the IDNR/SHL water quality monitoring from May 2004 through November 2006 showed 37 violations of the Class B(CW1) criteria for dissolved oxygen (7.0 mg/l) in the 80 samples (46%) collected. The violations were relatively minor with a minimum dissolved oxygen value of 4.9 mg/l in the 80 samples collected. Only one of the 8 samples (12%) collected from July to September 2009, however, violated the Class B(CW1) criterion of 7.0 mg/l: the sample collected on August 9, 2009 contained 6.8 mg/l of dissolved oxygen. According to U.S. EPA guidelines (U.S. EPA 1997b, page 3-17), a violation frequency of greater than 10% for conventional parameters such as pH and dissolved oxygen suggests impairment of aquatic life uses. Based on IDNR’s assessment methodology, however, these (2009) results suggest that the frequency of violations was not significantly greater than 10 percent; thus, these results did not suggest impairment of the Class B(WW2) aquatic life uses. Because, however, an aquatic life impairment due to low dissolved oxygen was identified for the 2010 assessment/listing cycle, and because the frequency of violations during the 2012 cycle approached the impairment level, the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses of this assessment segment will remain assessed as Section 303(d)-impaired (IR 5a) due to low dissolved oxygen. If the frequency of violations of the dissolved oxygen criterion continues to decline, this impairment may be de-listed for a future listing cycle.
A fish kill occurred on this stream reach on March 17, 2000. An estimated 4,800 fish were killed; no cause or source of the kill was identified. The following account is from the IDNR fish kill database and includes comments from the IDNR staff that investigated the kill:
"Dead fish were observed both upstream and downstream of the Smith Road bridge on the Yellow River, but only below the confluence with the unnamed tributary in section 17. North of Postville: water turbid and green, with high flow. The kill affected a 3.1 mile segment of the Yellow River. Dead fish were not observed in the unnamed trib that enters into the Yellow River in Sec. 17. A total of 12 species of fish were affected. After visually inspecting the habitat in the area that the fish kill occurred, we would rate the habitat as excellent. The bottom substrate of much of the stream is composed of gravel and cobble. Deeper water areas for fish overwintering locations are also available. The Smith Road Bridge is the upstream extent of the area in which we have stocked fingerling brown and rainbow trout. No trout were seen in any of the counts of dead fish. The total number of fish that were observed was very low for a stream of this size and habitat quality. In previous work by Paragamian (1986), between 3,000 and 5,000 fish/acre were seen in northeast Iowa streams of comparable sizes. We feel that there has been an unknown factor at work that has severely reduced the total fish community in this section of the Yellow River prior to the total kill that this incident has caused to occur."
In recent IR cycles (i.e., 2004-2012), the assessment of the impact of the 2000 fish kill on this stream segment has been considered a “potential impairment” and thus placed in non-303(d) IR Category (IR 3b) indicating that additional monitoring and investigation was needed. Based, however, on a review of 2000 fish kill report and the rationale for moving this impairment to IR Category 3b, the 2000 fish kill is now being moved to IR Category 5b for the following reasons: (1) the relatively large number of fish killed (~4,800), (2) the length of the kill (3.1 miles), and (3) the history of chemical/physical water quality issues in the segment (e.g., high violation frequency of dissolved oxygen criteria and extremely high E. coli levels). Based on this information and on other comments from IDNR staff that investigated the kill (see above), some type of pollutant cause is suspected of having caused this kill. Follow-up monitoring is needed to determine the status of the fish community in this assessment segment.
The assessment of the Class B(CW1) aquatic life uses was also based on data collected in 2011 and 2012 as part of the IDNR/SHL coldwater stream sampling projects. A series of biological metrics which reflect coldwater stream water quality and habitat integrity were calculated from the biological sampling data. The biological metrics are based on the numbers and types of benthic macroinvertebrate taxa that were collected in the stream sampling reach. The biological metrics were combined to make a coldwater benthic index (CBI). The index ranks the biological integrity of a coldwater stream sampling reach on a rising scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). The 2011 CBI score was 60. The 2012 CBI scores were 59.4 and 50. The aquatic life use support was assessed (monitored) as fully supporting (=FS), based on a comparison of the CBI scores with biological impairment criteria (BIC) established for the 2012 Section 305(b) report. The biological impairment criteria were determined from a statistical analysis of data collected at coldwater stream reference sites from 1994-2011. The CW BIC is 60 and this segment passed the CW BIC 1/3 times in a five-year period (2008-2012). IDNR normally requires a segment to have a simple majority of passing scores from multiple years in a five-year period to be considered fully supporting (monitored). However, this assessment of this segment of the Yellow River includes the professional judgment of IDNR staff incorporating an in-depth analysis of the metric scores, sampling conditions and the fish sampling that occurred at the time the benthic macroinvertebrates were sampled. A fish sample from 2012 contained over 5000 fish per mile and included 337 Brown Trout of various sizes and one Rainbow Trout.
Fish consumption uses remain “not assessed” due to the lack of fish contaminant monitoring in this stream segment.
